masterThesis
Encouraging learners to speak fluently using in-context photography through community based learning activities
Fecha
2016-04-25Registro en:
Barrett, T. (1986). Teaching about photography: Photographs and contexts. National Art
Education Association, 39(4), 33-36. doi:10.2307/3192986
Beardsmore, H. B. (1974). Testing oral fluency. IRAL-International Review of Applied
Linguistics in Language Teaching, 12(1-4), 317-326.
Benavides, D., Murcia, L., & Niño, M. (2009). Observing before learning: Visual material for
the learning of English as a foreign language. HOW Journal, 16(1), 93-111.
Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Bateman, B. (2002). Fluency: Achieving true mastery in the
learning process. (Technical report). VA, USA: University of Virginia Curry School of
Special Education.
Böhm, A. (2004). Theoretical coding: Text analysis in grounded theory. In U. Flick, E. Kardorff
& I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 270-275). London, UK: Sage
Publications.
Bowman, M. (1994, 1994, March). Using video in research. Spotlights, 45, 1-3.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, N.Y:
Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Regents.
Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial
learner. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 19-47.
Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency
and accuracy. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Burmark, L. (2008). In Frey N., Fisher D. (Eds.), Visual literacy: What you get is what you see.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Burnaford, G. E., Fischer, J., & Hobson, D. (2000). Teachers doing research: The power of
action through inquiry (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for
practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford, UK: University Press Oxford.
Bygate, M. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
18, 20-42.
Byrnes, J., & Wasik, B. A. (2009). Picture this: Using photography as a learning tool in early
childhood classrooms. Childhood Education, 85(4), 243-248.
doi:10.1080/00094056.2009.10523090
Clark, E. V. (2004). How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 472-478. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.012
Clavijo, A. (2014). Community-based pedagogies to enhance the EFL curriculum. LESLLA
(August 28-30), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Neatherlands.
Clavijo, A. (2015a). Implementing community-based pedagogies with teachers in Colombia to
enhance the EFL curriculum. In M. D. Perales Escudero, & M. G. Méndez López (Eds.),
Experiencias de docencia e investigación en lenguas modernas (pp. 32-44)
Clavijo, A. (2015b). Research tendencies in the teaching of English as a foreign language.
Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 5-10.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2010). Choosing a mixed methods design. Designing and
conducting mixed methods research (Second ed., pp. 53-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into
Practice, 39(3), 124-130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Dondis, D. A. (1973). A primer of visual literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Du, X. (2009). The affective filter in second language teaching. Asian Social Science, 5(8), 162-
165.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill
International.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 6-23.
Faerch, C., Haastrup, K., & Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner language and language learning.
University of Michigan, MI: Multilingual Matters Limited.
Fahim, M., Nili, M., & Shakouri, N. (2012). Globalization in foreign language education: A
pluralist perspective. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(4), 25-35
Felten, P. (2008). Visual literacy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6), 60-64.
Ferraz, D. d. M. (2014). Visual literacy: The interpretation of images in English classes. Eventos
Pedagógicos, 5(1), 16-28.
Freed, M. N., Ryan, J. M., & Hess, R. K. (1991). Handbook of statistical procedures and their
computer applications to education and the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: American
Council on Education/Macmillan.
Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Good, L. (2008). Teaching and learning with digital photography: Tips and tools for early
childhood classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2010). In Gruenewald D. A., Smith G. A. (Eds.), Placebased education in the global age: Local diversity (1st ed.). New York, NY: Physicology
Press.
Grugeon, E., Hubbard, L., & Smith, C. (2005). Teaching speaking and listening in the primary
school (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge
Gutstein, S. P. (1983). Using language functions to measure fluency. Paper Presented at the
Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto, Canada
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex, England:
Longman Pearson Education Limited.
Hopkins, D. (2014). A teacher's guide to classroom research (5th ed.). New York, NY: Open
University Press
Jin, S., & Boling, E. (2010). Instructional designer’s intentions and learners’ perceptions of the
instructional functions of visuals in an e-learning context. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(2),
143-166
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed
methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
doi:10.1177/1558689806298224
Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Khan, S., & Victori i Blaya, M. (2011). Strategies and spoken production on three oral
communication tasks. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Koester, A. J. (2002). The performance of speech acts in workplace conversations and the
teaching of communicative functions. System, 30(2), 167-184. doi:10.1016/S0346-
251X(02)00003-9
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design.
London, UK: Routlegde Taylor & Francis Group.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and the task of naming: Methodological
aspects of task based pedagogy. In G. Crookes, & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical
context (pp. 69-96). Clevedon Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2008). Cultural globalization and language education. New Haven: Yale
University Press
Linares, A. (2010). Using visual literacy in a sequence of picture stories to write narratives
(Master Thesis). Available from Universidad Francisco Jose de Caldas
Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of
effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Center for Effective Performance.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th
ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education Limited
Medina, R., Ramírez, M., & Clavijo, A. (2015). Reading the community critically in the digital
age: A multiliteracies approach. In P. Chamness Miller., Mantero. M, & Hendo. H (Ed.),
Readings in language studies (pp. 45-66). Grandville, MI: The International Society for
Language Studies. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2636.6563
Melaville, A., Berg, A. C., & Blank, M. J. (2006). Community-based learning: Engaging
students for success and citizenship. Washington DC, US: Coalition for Community
Schools.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005). Integrar los medios de comunicación al aprendizaje.
Al Tablero, (33), 2-30.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas
extranjeras: Inglés. formar en lenguas extranjeras, el reto. Bogotá: Revolución Educativa.
Colombia Aprende.
Decreto 1290, Por el cual se reglamenta la evaluación del aprendizaje y promoción de los
estudiantes de los niveles de educación básica y media. (2009)
Monsalve, S., & Correal, A. (2006). Children’s oral communication in English class activities:
An exploratory study. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 7(1), 131-
146.
Moran, M. J., & Tegano, D. W. (2005). Moving toward visual literacy: Photography as a
language of teacher inquiry. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 7(1), 1-20.
Moskal, B. M., & Leydens, J. A. (2000). Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10), 71-81.
Mullen, L. (1998). Truth in photography: Perception, myth and reality in the postmodern world.
(master thesis). Available from University of Florida.
Myers, N., & Dillard, B. R. (2012). An action research project’s impact on teachers’ leadership
attitudes and perceptions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 10(1), 69-74.
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York,
NY: Routledge
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Pawlak, M., Waniek-Klimczak, E., & Majer, J. (2011). Speaking and instructed foreign
language acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Perkins, D. (1993). Teaching for understanding. The Professional Journal of the American
Federation of Teachers, 17(3), 28-35.
Phan, L. (2008). Language, culture and identity. In L. Phan (Ed.), Teaching English as an
international language: Identity, resistance and negotiation (pp. 25-69). Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Poore, M. (2015). Using social media in the classroom: A best practice guide. London, NY:
Sage Publications.
Popham, W. J. (2012). The role of rubrics in testing and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied
linguistics (Fourth ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. In W. M.
Rivers (Ed.), Interactive language teaching (pp. 3-16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press
Sagor, R. D. (2010). The action research guidebook: A four-stage process for educators and
school teams (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sarmiento, M. (2010). A guided reading of images: A strategy to develop critical thinking and
communicative skills. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(2), 72-86
Sharkey, J. (2012). Community-based pedagogies and literacies in language teacher education:
Promising beginnings, intriguing challenges. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 17(1),
9-13
Sharkey, J., & Clavijo, A. (2012). Community-based pedagogies: Projects and possibilities in
colombia and the united states. In A. Honigsfeld, & A. Cohan (Eds.), Breaking the mold of
education for culturally and linguistically diverse students: Innovative and successful
practices for the twenty-first century (pp. 129-137). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Education.
Sieber, E. (2001, Teaching with objects and photographs. Supporting and Enhancing Your
Curriculum. A Guide for Teachers.,1-56.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn
& Bacon.
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community (2nd ed.). Great
Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
Spandel, V. (2006). In defense of rubrics. English Journal, 96(1), 19-22.
Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic
Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(1), 10-19.
Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and
contestation across cultures. UK: R&L Education.
Villani, C. J., & Atkins, D. (2000). Community-based education. School Community Journal,
10(1), 39-44.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for english language learners: A conceptual
framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
doi:10.1080/13670050608668639
Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian
Journal of Language and Literacy, 333(3), 211-239
Willis, J. (2001). A framework for task-based learning. Haworth, UK: Longman.
Wright, A. (1989). Pictures for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). 'Triangulation' research method as the tool of social
science research. Bup Journal, 1(1), 154-163.
Zhao, Q. A., & Stasko, J. T. (2002). What's happening? Promoting community awareness
through opportunistic, peripheral interfaces. AVI '02 Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Trento, IT. 69-74.
doi:10.1145/1556262.1556271
262078
TE08261
Autor
Rodriguez Buitrago, July Carolina
Institución
Resumen
El propósito de este proyecto es determinar los efectos del uso de fotografías en contexto para mejorar la fluidez oral a través del enfoque de aprendizaje basado en la comunidad. Esta investigación de acción colaborativa fue realizada con 60 estudiantes de octavo grado con nivel pre A1, de dos instituciones en Colombia. Las instituciones CEDID Ciudad Bolívar y Marco Antonio Carreño Silva, de carácter público en la capital de Colombia. En estudios anteriores sobre el aprendizaje basado en la comunidad, los investigadores aplicaron estrategias interesantes para desarrollar las habilidades de producción oral y escrita, mediante el uso de ayudas visuales como las herramientas primarias. Investigaciones locales anteriores han demostrado un desarrollo curricular de parte de los profesores, la investigación del alumnado y la de alfabetización en inglés. Sin embargo, estas se han centrado principalmente en habilidades de pensamiento crítico y no se han concentrado en la mejora de una habilidad particular de la lengua, específicamente de producción oral. Estos estudios no se centraron en el uso de fotografías orientadas a la comunidad para fomentar la fluidez oral, que es el foco de esta investigación. A lo largo de la intervención pedagógica, las docentes (quienes también actuaron como investigadoras) compilaron información a través de fotografías, artefactos, rúbricas, y vídeos. También, se implementó una encuesta al final de cada una de las tres etapas de la implementación pedagógica para recoger información sobre los estudiantes y su desempeño.