masterThesis
Enhancing metacognitive reading awareness in blended environments
Fecha
2015-10-26Registro en:
Abdi, R. (2013). The effect of using hypertext materials on reading comprehension ability of EFL
learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 557-562.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.106
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual Differences in Strategy use in Second Language Reading and
Testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-
4781.1991.tb05384.x
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning
(ED463659). ERIC Digest. Education Resources Information Center.
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). San Francisco: W.H.
Freeman.
Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of
the conference. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the
acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415−431). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Baker, L, & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook
of reading research. (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman
Bauman, J.F. & Duffy-Hester, A.M. (2000) Making sense of classroom worlds: Methodology in
teacher research. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Person & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of
reading research, Volume III (pp. 77-98).
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F.
Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Beijing:
Foreign language teaching and research press.
Brown, J. D. (2000). What is construct validity? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 4 (2), 8-12
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Caverly, D. C., Mandeville, T. F., & Nicholson, S. A.( 1995). PLAN: A study-reading strategy for
informational text. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(3), 190–199
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). Language learner and learning strategies. In N. C. Ellis
(Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 371- 392). London: Academic.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El Dinary, P.B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies
handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1985). Research methods in education. London: Croom Helm.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative
criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 19(6), 418-427. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach
(Kindle version). Retrieved from Amazon.com
Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through
metacognitive strategies. The Journal of International Social Research,1, 83 - 93.
Elley, W. B. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based
programs. Language Learning, 41(3), 375-411. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00611.x
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language
Education Press.
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.),
The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Malden, Mass: WileyBlackwell.
Eluemuno, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive skills on performance in English language among
senior secondary school students in Anambra state, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in
Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 4, 678 - 685.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of
intelligence (pp.231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental
inquiry. American Psychologist. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
Friesner, T., & Hart, M. (2005). Learning logs: Assessment or research method? Electronic Journal of
Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 117-122. Retrieved from www.ejbrm.com
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in
higher education. Internet and Higher Education. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gimenez, J. (2000). A self-access center for business English learners: meeting individual learning
needs. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), Technology-enhanced learning environments: Case studies in
TESOL practice series. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative
Report, 8(4), 597-607.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist,
6, 126−135.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Longman.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge
and learning activity types: curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of
Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
Joppe, M. (2000). The research process. In N. Golafshani (Ed.). Understanding reliability and validity
in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Lan, Y.C., Lo, Y.L., & Hsu, Y.S. (2014). The effects of meta-cognitive instruction on students‟ reading
comprehension in computerized reading contexts: A quantitative meta-analysis. Educational
Technology & Society, 17 (4), 186–202
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Mcdonald, J. (2006). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide (1st ed.). Cornwall:
Gower.
Magliano, J. P., Todaro, S., Millis, K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H. J., & McNamara, D. S. (2005).
Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and
computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 185–208.
Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Merrill.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing student‟s metacognitive awareness of reading
strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.
Montalvo, L.S. (2013) Improving reading comprehension and self-directed learning through the use of
explicit reading strategies and personal blogs on high school students. (Master‟s thesis).
Universidad de la Sabana, Chia
Nassaji, H. (2007). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading
comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 57(1), 79-113.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive
guide. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, issuing body, publisher. Programme for
International Student Assessment (OECD), sponsoring body. (2014). PISA 2012 results in
focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know
O‟Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R.P. (1985). Learning
strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
O‟Malley, J. M., Chamot, A, U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning
strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-
584.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palincsar, A. S. (1985, April). The unpacking of a multi-component, metacognitive training package.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association,
Chicago.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Pearson, D., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344.
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated
learning. In: G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (43-
97). Lincoln NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements
Prensky, M. (2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today‟s learners demand. Educause Review, 40(5),
61–64.
Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P.B., & Brown, R. (1992). Skilled and not-so-skilled reading: Good
information processing and not-so-good information processing. In M. Pressley, K. Harris, & J.
Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 91-127). San
Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively
responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B.
Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III.
Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign language study. Language Learning
40, 189-219.
Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: The
interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental
Education, 60(4), 293-306. doi:10.1080/00220973.1992.9943867
Rivers, W. M., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or
foreign language. New York: Oxford University Press
Salda a, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development:
Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 81(4), 620–627.
Sanders, R. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost
reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 523-532.
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998), Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in
native and foreign language reading comprehension: An Empirical study among Dutch students
in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1): 71–106. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00033
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for
developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived
learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331.
doi:10.1080/0158791010220208
Tracey, D., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading. New York: Guilford Press.
Urquhart, V., & Frazee, D. (2012). Teaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then
who? (3rd ed.). Denver: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Wallace, M. (1998). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face to face and electronic discussion in the second language
classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2-3), 7-26
Warschauer, M., & Whittaker, P. F. (1997). The internet for English teaching: Guidelines for teachers.
TESL Reporter, 30(1), 27–33
Westera, W., & Sloep, P. (2001). The future of education in cyberspace. In L. R Vandervert, L. V.
Shavinina, & R. A. Cornell (Eds.), Cyber education: The future of Distance Learning.
Larchmont, NY: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 115-136.
Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Sun, C. H., & Embi, M. A. (2013). Pros and cons of using ICT in
teaching ESL reading and writing. International Education Studies, 6(7), 119-130.
doi:10.5539/ies.v6n7p119
Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading
strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 44(2), 320-353.
doi:10.1080/09658410108667039
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:
Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
175997
TE07810
Autor
Bogoya, Alethia
Institución
Resumen
Este proyecto de investigación-acción muestra los efectos de aplicar el modelo de aprendizaje combinado para desarrollar procesos metacognitivos en la lectura, en 19 estudiantes con bajo dominio de inglés, en un colegio público de Ibagué, Colombia; desarrollándose siete sesiones durante dos meses y medio, por 21 horas. Las estrategias metacognitivas de lectura, enseñadas directamente, se eligieron antes de la intervención, con base en el cuestionario MARSI (Inventario sobre estrategias metacognitivas de lectura). El enfoque método- mixto permitió analizar los datos. El investigador midió el rendimiento de lectura y la frecuencia de uso de estrategias de lectura, implementando una prueba de lectura previa y posterior, y el MARSI. Se usaron instrumentos de recolección de datos como el diario del profesor, registros de lectura de estudiantes y una entrevista; midiendo los niveles de metacognición en lectura, y el efecto de actividades de aprendizaje del idioma basadas en la tecnología. El análisis cuantitativo muestra en general, que las intervenciones no tuvieron un impacto significativo en las habilidades de lectura. El análisis cualitativo indica que el modelo de aprendizaje combinado, ayudó a los estudiantes a aumentar su metacognición al planificar, supervisar y auto-evaluar su proceso de lectura.