masterThesis
Enhancing Fluency in Speaking Through the Use of Collaborative and Self- Directed Speaking Tasks
Fecha
2014-10-17Registro en:
Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Bateman, B. (2002). Fluency: Achieving true mastery in the
learning process. Professional Papers in Special Education, 2-20.
Bloom, C., & Cooperman, D. K. (1999). Synergistic stuttering therapy: A holistic approach.
Butterworth-Heinemann.
Brown, J. (2003). Promoting fluency in EFL classrooms. In JALT Pan-SIG Conference
Proceedings. Kyoto, Japan.
Brown, S., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Laird, A. R., & Fox, P. T. (2005). Stuttered and fluent
speech production: an ALE meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Human
brain mapping, 25(1), 105-117.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2005). Staying critical. Educational Action Research,13(3), 347-358
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1),
1-39.
Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Cooperman, D., & Bloom, C. M. Treating Young Children Who Stutter: A Holistic View.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed
methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research,
209-240
De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental
study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning:
Cognitive and computational approaches., 1-19
Du, F. (2012). Using study plans to develop self-directed learning skills: implications from a
pilot project. College Student Journal, 46, 223-232
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment implications for health,
education, and the workplace. Psychological science in the public interest, 5(3), 69-106.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press, USA
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press, USA.
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language
fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic
immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(02), 275-301.
García-Amaya, L. (2009). New findings on fluency measures across three different learning
contexts. In Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 68-80).
Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond
the debate. Integrative psychological and behavioral science,42(3), 266-290.
Hartmann, R. R. K., & Stork, F. C. (1972). Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.
Hieke, A. E. (1985). A componential approach to oral fluency evaluation. The Modern Language
Journal, 69(2), 135-142.
Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. Retrieved April, 12, 2009
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm
whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26
Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods
research. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 297-319.
Kato, H. (1997). Some Thoughts on Oral Examination for Advance Students in Japanese System.
5, (3). 181-186. In: Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom.
Boston. Heinle & Heinle.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of
second language learners. System, 32(2), 145-164
Leeman, J. (2006). The value of Spanish: Shifting language ideologies in United States
language teaching. ADFL Bulletin, 38, 32-39.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach*.Language
Learning, 40(3), 387-417
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language
teaching. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, 18, 77-99
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self‐directed learning: Pillars of adult learning
theory. New Directions for adult and continuing education, 2001(89), 3-14
Mohle, M. (1984). A comparison of the second language speech production of different native
speakers. Second language production, Günter Narr, Tübingen (1984), pp. 26–49
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching.
Cambridge University Press
Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining'task'. Asian EFL
Journal, 8(3)
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy (Vol. 20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J., Platt, J., Weber, H., & Inman, P. (1986). Longman dictionary of applied
linguistics. RELC Journal, 17(2), 105-110
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching.
Cambridge University Press.
Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative
speaker conversations. Discourse processes, 14(4), 423-441
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1994). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative
problem solving. NATO ASI Series F Computer and Systems Sciences, 128, 69-69.
Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in
second language acquisition, 14, 357-357.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced
learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119
Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the
elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and instruction, 10(4), 311-330
Wolf, J. P. (2008). The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 oral task
production. System, 36(2), 279-294.
259873
TE06872
Autor
Cruz Corzo, Carolina
Institución
Resumen
El propósito de este proyecto de investigación es analizar los efectos que el uso de tareas orales auto-dirigidas y colaborativas puedan ejercer en la habilidad de la producción oral en estudiantes de nivel pre-intermedio de inglés teniendo en cuenta su renuencia para hablar en inglés dentro y fuera del salón de clase. La estrategia utilizada se basó en la implementación de tareas de producción oral, una por semana, en las cuales los estudiantes auto-dirigían sus estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje con el fin de crear un trabajo colaborativo que los llevara a desarrollar productos orales preparados o improvisados. Después de la implementación del estudio, los participantes afirmaron haber aumentado su grado de confianza y haber mejorado sus habilidades lingüísticas, y solicitaron incluir este tipo de actividades en sus clases.