masterThesis
Developing reading skills in a collaborative learning environment
Fecha
2014-11-19Registro en:
Astin, A. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco/United States: Jossey
Bass.
Barkley, R. (2012). Functional impairment scale--children and adolescents (Bfis-CA). New
York/United States: Guilford Press, p180.
Bartunek, J. (1993). The multiple cognitions and conflicts associated with second order
organizational change: social psychology in organization: Marnighan (Ed),
Advances in theory and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hal
Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social science. Needhan heights: A
Pearson education company.
Bonwell, C., & Eison. J. (1991). Active learning. Creating excitement in the classroom.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.
Brown, J.A., Collins., & Duguid, P (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.
Educational researcher. 18 (1),
Burgess, R. (1984). In the field. An introduction to field research: Routledge. 272.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th Edition). Addison
Wesley: Longman, Inc.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting the discipline: a webbased
reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education, 48(3). 409-426
Cohen, L., Manion. L., & Morrison, K. (2007). How research methods in edition (5th
edition ed.) London: Routledge Falmer.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.
Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.
Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Crowley, M., & Dunn, K. (1992). Moving towards a Cooperative Classroom’, handout
from workshop presented at S.T.L.H.E. conference, York University
Davis, G. H. (1981). Technology – Humanism or Nihilism: A critical study of the
philosophical basis and practice of modern technology. Washington DC: University
Press of America.
Debowski, S. (2005). Across the divide: Teaching and transnational MBA in a second
language. Higher Education Research and Development, 24 (3): 265-280
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: The discipline and practice of
qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds). Handbook of qualitative
research (2nd. Ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dole, J., Brown, K. & Trathen, W. (1996). “The effects of strategy instruction in the
comprehension performance of at-risk students”. Reading Research Quarterly
31:62-89
Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1989). Sharing and responding. London: Random House.
Fielding, L. G., Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1990). How discussion questions
influence children`s story understanding (Technical Report No. 490). Urbana:
University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Gillham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire: British Library Cataloguing-in.Publication
Data.
Golub, J. (1988). Focus on collaborative learning: National Council of Teachers of English.
Committee on Classroom Practices. 170.
Guiora, A. (2008). Fundamentals on Counterterrorism. Aspen Publishers.
Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C., Rice,
M. E., Faibisch, F., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. (1996). Growth in literacy
engagement: Changes in motivation and strategies during Concept-Oriented
Reading Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-325.
Hamilton, D. (1994). Traditions, preferences, and postures in applied qualitative research.In
N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering
the role of assessment in student learning. Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 53-
64.
Holubec, E. (1992); ‘How do you Get There from Here? Getting Started With Cooperative
Learning’, Contemporary Education 63(3), 181-184.
Hughes, H., & Townley, A. (1994). Cooperative Learning in Graduate Education: A Study
of Its Effectiveness in Administrator Training in Two California Universities’,
ERIC document ED 375517
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Holubec, E.J. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the
Classroom. ASCD. Alexandria, VA
Johnson, D. W., & Holubec, R.T. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in
cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology. 130(4), 507-516
Johnson, D. Roger, T. Edythe, J. Holubec. (1990); Circles of learning: cooperation in the
classroom; 154.
Kadel, S., & Keehner, J. (1994). Collaborative Learning: A sourcebook for Higher
Education vol. 2 (National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and
Assessment, Pennsylvania State University)
Katzenbach, J, R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high
performance organization. Harvard Bussiness School. Boston. M.A.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1989). The natural approach: language Acquisition in the
classroom. Pergamon: Prentice Hall
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Liu, E., Lin, S., Chiu, C., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer review. The learner as both
adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education. 44(3). 246-251.
Cagliari, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). The cognitive assessment system: Interpretive
handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. ERIC
Clearinghouse on reading and communication skills
Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In spector, J. M.,
Merrill, M. D., van Merriemboer, J., & Driscoll, M. P. (Eds). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 125-143). New York. NY:
Taylor & Francis Group.
Nunan, D. (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching, Cambridge University
Press, 272.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning; Cambridge University
Press, 249.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.
Newburry House Publisher.
Paynter, D., Bodrova, E., & Doty, J. (2005). For the love of words: Vocabulary instruction
that works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Pineda, C. (2001). Developing English as a foreign language curriculum: The need for an
articulated framework. Colombian Applied linguistics Journal, 3, 6-20.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of
constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Richards, J.C. & T.S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.
Cambridge: CUP.
Scovel, T. (2001). Learning new languages: a guide to second language acquisition. Heinle &
Heinle.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from
connectionist models. Psychological Review. 106(3), 491-528.
Stahl, S., & Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching Words Meanings. Mahwah, NJ:L. Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. 2000. Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and
New Frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1994). A model for studies of Reading disability. Developmental review,
225-245.
Stringer, E.T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Sundstrom, E., DeMuese, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and
effectiveness. The American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.
Vargas and Abouchaar (2001)
Tolman, C., Working smarter, not harder: What teachers of reading need to know and be
able to teach. Perspectives, 2005. 21: p. 15-23.
Walqui, A. (2000) Contextual Factors of Second Language Acquisition. (ERIC Digest) San
Francisco, California. University of California (September 2000).
Wartofsky, M.W. (1989). Models: Representation and scientific understanding. Dordrecht,
the Netherlands: Reidel
Worthen, J.B., & Loveland, J.M. (2003). Disruptive effects of bizarreness in free and cued
recall of self-performed and other performed acts: the costs of item-specific
processing. In S.P. Shohov (Ed.) Advances in Psychology Research. Vol 24. (pp. 3-
17). Hauppauge. NY: Nova Science Publishers
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading
research Quarterly. 23. 159-177.
260028
TE07001
Autor
Cuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
Institución
Resumen
Esta investigación presenta los resultados de un proyecto de investigación centrado en el desarrollo de habilidades de lectura a través de un aprendizaje colaborativo para un grupo de adolescentes entre los 16 a 18 años de edad en una Institución Educativa privada colombiana con un grupo de estudiantes de onceavo grado. Por lo tanto, el objetivo principal de la investigación fue explorar analizar y evaluar la forma en que los estudiantes desarrollan las habilidades de lectura a través del aprendizaje colaborativo; Para recolectar la información en este estudio de investigación acción, se emplearon un cuestionario, un registro y tres artefactos que fueron utilizados para recopilar la información de este estudio de investigación acción. Los resultados revelaron que la exposición a diferentes estrategias de aprendizaje colaborativo, los estudiantes pudieron reforzar su comprensión y análisis al momento de leer, a su vez tuvieron la oportunidad para demostrar el impacto que la lectura pudo tener cuando se desarrolló en un ambiente colaborativo; también; los estudiantes fueron capaces de reconocer sus fortalezas de aprendizaje, y utilizar estrategias que permitan mejorar las habilidades de lectura.