Ipsative assessment of essay writing to foster reflection and self-awareness of progress

dc.contributorAcero Ríos, Claudia Lucía
dc.contributorAlvira Quiroga, Jesús Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-15T17:43:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T14:09:02Z
dc.date.available2014-11-15T17:43:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T14:09:02Z
dc.date.created2014-11-15T17:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-15
dc.identifierAltrichter, H., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Zuber- Skerritt, O. (2002). The concept of action research. The Learning Organization, 9 (3), 125- 131
dc.identifierÁlvarez, A. (2001). Textos Expositivo-Explicativos y Argumentativos. Barcelona: Octaedro
dc.identifierBarbour, R. S. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire? Qualitative Health Research, 8 (3), 352-361.
dc.identifierBailey, K. (2006). Language teacher supervision. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierBiggs, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham, BP: Open University Press).
dc.identifierBoud, D (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22 (2) 151-167.
dc.identifierBrice, C. (1995). ESL writers’ reactions to teacher commentary: A case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Long Beach, CA: Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 312.
dc.identifierBrown, D. (2001) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. New York, NY: Pearson Education
dc.identifierBrown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. Tesol Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675.
dc.identifierBrown, S. & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London, LN: Kogan Page.
dc.identifierBurns, A. (2005). Action research: Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifierCoffin, C., Curry, M.J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. London, LN: Routledge.
dc.identifierCohen, A.D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions, in A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, London: Prentice Hall International Ltd.: 57–69.
dc.identifierCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. 5 th Edition. London, LN: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifierCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifierConrad, C., Neumann, A., Haworth, J. G., & Scott, P. (1993). Qualitative research in higher education: Experiencing alternative perspective and approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
dc.identifierCorbin, A., & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. London, LN: Stage Publications.
dc.identifierCorey, S. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
dc.identifierCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for language learning and teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierCreswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-131.
dc.identifierCreswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifierDenzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifierDíaz, Á. (2002). La Argumentación Escrita. Colombia, CO: Caminos. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
dc.identifierDick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. 4th ed. New York, NY: Harper Collin.
dc.identifierDing, L. (1998) Revisiting assessment and learning: implications of students’ perspectives on assessment feedback. Paper presented to Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee, 25–26 September.
dc.identifierDörney, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierDuncan, N. (2007) “Feed-forward”: improving students’ use of teacher comments. Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 32 (3), 271 – 283.
dc.identifierFernández, S., Córdoba, A., Cordero. J., & Córdoba, A. (2002). Measures of dispersion: Descriptive statistics. (2nd edition), ESIC, 134.
dc.identifierFerris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. London, LN: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.identifierGardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, LN: Edward Arnold.
dc.identifierGardner, A., & Johnson, D. (1997). Teaching personal experience narrative in the elementary and beyond. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern ArizonaWriting Project Press.
dc.identifierGibbs, G & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning? Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
dc.identifierGolafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-606. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8- 4/golafshani.pdf.
dc.identifierGrabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Harlow, ESSEX: Longman.
dc.identifierGreen, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & W. F. Graham. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed- Method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11 (3): 255-74
dc.identifierHamayan, E. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.
dc.identifierHarmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. New York, NY: Longman.
dc.identifierHartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding & Cooperative Learning. Human Learning and Instruction (pp. 23-69). New York: City College of City University of New York.
dc.identifierHattie, J., and H. Timperley. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, no. 1: 81–112.
dc.identifierHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierHedge, T. (2005) Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierHiggins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton. A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 1, 53–64.
dc.identifierHughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge, CAMBS: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierHughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: a case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353-367. 10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
dc.identifierHughes, G., Okumoto, K. & Wood, E. (2011). Ipsative Assessment and Motivation of Distance Learners. A report on a Center for Distance Education research project London, published online http://cdelondon.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/use-of-ipsativeassessment-in-distance-learning/(accessed on 21 February 2014).
dc.identifierHyland, K. (1990). Genre description of argumentative essay. Papua New Guinea: University of Technology Lae
dc.identifierHyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment, in: P. Hyland & a. Booth (Eds) The practice of University history teaching. Manchester: Manchester University Press
dc.identifierHyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifierJohnson, R. B. and L. Christensen. (2004). Education Research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, 2nd Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
dc.identifierKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planner. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
dc.identifierKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Reader. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press
dc.identifierKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1992). The action research planner. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
dc.identifierKemmis, S., & MacTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567_ 605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifierKlimova, F. B. (2011). Assessment methods in the course on academic writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 2604- 2608, Elsevier Ltd.
dc.identifierLeCompte, M.D., & Schensul, J.J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Retrieved from: http://www.actionresearch.net/living/marianlothian/mlphdch5.pdf
dc.identifierLeki, L.(2001). Material, educational, and ideological challenges of teaching EFL writing at the turn of the century. International Journal of English Studies, Vol. 1(2), 2001, pp.197- 209.
dc.identifierLópez, M., Alexis A., & Bernal, R. (2009). Language testing in Colombia: A call for more teacher education and teacher training in language assessment. Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, 11(2), 55-70. Retrieved on July 4th from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169216301005
dc.identifierLynch, R. (2003). Authentic, performance-based assessment in ESL/ EFL reading instruction. Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=2
dc.identifierMcCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierMackey, A, & Gass, S. (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.
dc.identifierMarshall, S. (1991). A genre-based approach to the teaching of report- writing. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 10(1), p.3-13 [Revistas arbitradas]
dc.identifierMathison, S. (1988). Why Triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 13-17.
dc.identifierMatsuda, P. K. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing 12.1 (2003): 65-83.
dc.identifierMcMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decisionmaking: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22 (4), 34-43
dc.identifierMcNamara, T. F. (1997). Performance testing. In The Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 7: Language testing and assessment (Vol. 7, pp. 131-139). Boston, BS: Dordrecht, Kluwer.
dc.identifierMendoza, E. (2005). Current state of the teaching of process writing in EFL classes: An observational study in the last two years of secondary school. PROFILE Journal, 6, 23- 36.
dc.identifierMelgarejo, A. (2009). Assessing children’s perceptions of writing in EFL based on the process approach. Colombian Applied linguistics Journal (12), 70 – 84.
dc.identifierMiles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifierMishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60 (4), 415- 442.
dc.identifierMorrison, B. (2010). Developing a culturally- relevant genre- based writing course for distance learning. In Language Education in Asia, 1, 171-180.
dc.identifierMyles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, Volume 6, Number 2. Retrieved on 4 July 2014 from http:www.tesl.ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume6/ej22al/
dc.identifierNicol, D., and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 2, 199–218.
dc.identifierNoffke, S. E., & Zeichner, K. M. (1987). Action research and teacher thinking: The first phase of the action research on action research project at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Washington, DC: AERA. ERIC Document ED295939
dc.identifierNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, BS: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifierNunan, D. & Bailey K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research - a comprehensive guide. Boston, BS: Heinle Cengage Learning
dc.identifierOlson, J. & Platt, J. (2000). The instructional cycle. Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
dc.identifierPatton, MQ. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Edition). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications
dc.identifierPhillips, D.K. & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a teacher through action research: Process, context, and self-study. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifierPratt-Johnson, Y. (2008). Promoting acquisition of academic vocabulary in English- medium secondary education in the USA. ELIA, pp. 205-218. Retrieved on 5 July 2014 from http://institucional.us.es/revistas/revistas/elia/pdf/8/11.Pratt-johnson.pdf
dc.identifierRaymond, E. (2000). Cognitive Characteristics: Learners with Mild Disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, A Pearson Education Company.
dc.identifierRamsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, LN: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifierRowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London, LN: Kogan Page.
dc.identifierSagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook. California, CA: Corvin Press.
dc.identifierBachman, L. F. (2oo4a). Linking observations to interpretations and uses in TESOL research. TESOL Quarterly, 38/4: 723-8.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/12491
dc.identifier260020
dc.identifierTE06993
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3473968
dc.description.abstractLa evaluación Ipsativa para mejorar la redacción de textos argumentativos tuvo como objetivo analizar cómo un tipo alternativo de evaluación influyó en la habilidad de escritura de 14 adultos jóvenes y 10 adultos de dos universidades colombianas, una con un programa de idiomas para los estudiantes de pregrado de diversas carreras, y la otra en un programa de licenciatura . Ambos contextos, el presencial y en línea correspondientemente, fueron sometidos al mismo proceso de intervención e investigación. Debido a la naturaleza propia de la evaluación ipsativa, este estudio también se interesó en sus efectos sobre el aprendizaje auto-dirigido y a largo plazo. Las preguntas de la investigación se enfocaron en analizar como los estudiantes estructuraban sus ensayos por medio de la retroalimentación ipsativa y como este enfoque de evaluación influenció a los estudiantes a nivel individual. Para este estudio de investigación se reunieron datos cualitativos y cuantitativos de los 24 estudiantes a través de cuatro tipos de instrumentos: pre y post-cuestionarios, un formato ipsativo, ensayos de los estudiantes y sus calificaciones. Estos datos se analizaron por medio de muestreo teórico y estadística descriptiva. El primero permitió a los profesores-investigadores identificar patrones en las reflexiones de los estudiantes y la última describe el desempeño de los estudiantes en la escritura del ensayo. Los resultados revelaron que por medio de la evaluación ipsativa los estudiantes mejoraron la escritura de un ensayo argumentativo ya que comprendieron la importancia de la estructura retórica y el carácter reflexivo de la escritura. La comparación de diversos borradores le permitió a los estudiantes reflexionar sobre cómo mejorar su trabajo al mismo tiempo que les llevo a tomar conciencia de su progreso.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.publisherMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisherDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanza -- Colombia
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Educación
dc.subjectEscritura -- Inglés
dc.titleIpsative assessment of essay writing to foster reflection and self-awareness of progress
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución