dc.contributorPontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística
dc.creatorvan EgmondI, Sven
dc.creatorDe Vries, Esther
dc.creatorHollestein, Loes
dc.creatorBastiaens, Maarten
dc.creatorDe Roos, Peter
dc.creatorKuijpers, Danielle
dc.creatorSteyerberg, Ewout
dc.creatorWakkee, Marlies
dc.creatorMosterd, Klara
dc.creatorNijsten, Tamar
dc.creatorde Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T13:12:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T21:53:35Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T13:12:07Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T21:53:35Z
dc.date.created2022-04-25T13:12:07Z
dc.identifier1932-6203 (Electrónico)
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/59674
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249298
dc.identifierinstname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.javeriana.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3469324
dc.description.abstractBackground Follow-up after low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is being provided more frequently than recommended by guidelines. To design an acceptable strategy to successfully reduce this ‘low-value’ care, it is important to obtain insights into the preferences of patients and dermatologists. Objective To determine the preferences and needs of patients and dermatologists to reduce low-risk BCC follow-up care, and the trade-offs they are willing to make. Methods A questionnaire including a discrete choice experiment was created, containing attributes regarding amount of follow-up, continuity of care, method of providing addition information, type of healthcare provider, duration of follow-up visits and skin examination. In total, 371 BCC patients and all Dutch dermatologists and dermatology residents (n = 620) were invited to complete the questionnaire. A panel latent class model was used for analysis. Results Eighty-four dermatologists and 266 BCC patients (21% and 72% response rates respectively) completed the discrete choice experiment. If the post-treatment visit was performed by the same person as treatment provider and a hand-out was provided to patients containing personalised information, the acceptance of having no additional follow-up visits (i.e. following the guidelines) would increase from 55% to 77% by patients. Female patients and older dermatologists, however, are less willing to accept the guidelines and prefer additional follow-up visits. Limitations The low response rate of dermatologists. Conclusion This discrete choice experiment revealed a feasible strategy to substantially reduce costs, while maintaining quality of care, based on the preferences and needs of BCC patients, which is supported by dermatologists.
dc.languageeng
dc.relatione0249298
dc.relationPLoS ONE
dc.relation16
dc.relation3
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectPacientes
dc.subjectDermatólogos
dc.subjectCarcinoma
dc.subjectExperimento de elección discreta
dc.titleWhat do patients and dermatologists prefer regarding low-risk basal cell carcinoma follow-up care? A discrete choice experiment


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución