Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano

dc.creatorCaicedo Marulanda, Carolina
dc.creatorPla Barber, Jose
dc.creatorLeón-Darder, Fidel
dc.creatorMora Rodríguez, Jhon James
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T19:35:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T18:51:24Z
dc.date.available2019-10-11T19:35:11Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T18:51:24Z
dc.date.created2019-10-11T19:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier1886516X (en línea)
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10614/11201
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3459782
dc.description.abstractEste artículo presenta nuevas estimaciones de distancia en los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y 57 países de Europa, América, Asia, África y Oceanía. El concepto de distancia que utilizamos trasciende el plano de lo institucional e incorpora tanto aspectos institucionales como aquellos que aún no han sido considerados en la literatura como el mercado laboral, la práctica mercantil y la innovación. De esta forma, a partir de la construcción de un índice sintético de distancia nosotros calculamos las distancias entre Colombia y los países de la muestra usando el concepto de distancia de Mahalanobis en las dimensiones aquí analizadas. Nuestros resultados muestran que si bien hay avances en la globalización sobre los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y los países de la muestra, todavía existen restricciones a las que se enfrentan las empresas colombianas que están interesadas en incursionar estos mercados buscando beneficiarse de los acuerdos de libre comercio
dc.description.abstractThis article presents new estimations of the distance in international business between Colombia and 57 countries in Europe, America, Asia, Africa and Oceania. The concept of distance that we use transcends the institutional level and incorporates both institutional aspects and those that have not yet been considered in the literature such as labor market, business practice and innovation. In this way, we build a holistic distance index and discuss the results for the specific case of Colombia. Thus, from the construction of a synthetic index of distance, we calculated the distances between Colombia and the countries of the sample using the Mahalanobis distance in the dimensions analyzed here. Our results show that although there is progress in the globalization of international business between Colombia and the countries of the sample there are still restrictions faced by Colombian companies that are interested in entering these markets seeking to benefit from the free trade agreements
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pablo de Olavide
dc.relation47
dc.relation24
dc.relation23
dc.relationCaicedo Marulanda, C., Pla Barber, J., León Darder, F., & Mora, J. J. (2017). Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano/Towards Holistic Version of Distance in International Business: The Colombian Case. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 23, 24-47
dc.relationRevista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa
dc.relationAnderson, J. & Marcouiller, D. (2002): “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 342-352
dc.relationBae, J. & Salomon, R. (2010): “Institutional distance in international business research”, en Devinney, T., Pedersen, T. & Tihanyi, L. (eds.): The Past, Present and Future of International Business & Management (Advances in International Management, 23), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 327-349
dc.relationBarkema, H., Bell, J. & Pennings, J. (1996): “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151-166
dc.relationBénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M. & Mayer, T. (2007): “Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment”, World Economy, 30(5): 764-782
dc.relationBerry, H., Guillen, M. & Zhou, N. (2010): “An institutional approach to cross-national distance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460-1480
dc.relationBerthelon, M. & Freund, C. (2008): “On the Conservation of Distance in International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 75(2): 310-320
dc.relationBurdenski, T. (2000): “Evaluating univariate, bivariate, and multivariate normality using graphical and statistical procedures”, Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26(2): 15-28
dc.relationBusenitz, L., Gómez, C. & Spencer, J. (2000): “Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994-1003
dc.relationChang, Y-C., Kao, M-S. & Chiu, C-F. (2011): “How cultural distance influences entry mode choice: The contingent role of host country's governance quality”, Journal of Business Research, 65(8): 1160-1170
dc.relationCea D’Ancona, M. (2002): Análisis Multivariable Teoría y Práctica en la Investigación Social, Madrid: Editorial Síntesis
dc.relationChao, M. & Kumar, V. (2010): “The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship”, Journal of World Business, 45(1): 93-103
dc.relationDeardorff, A. (1987): “Why Do Governments Prefer Nontariff Barriers?", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 26: 191-216
dc.relationDeardorff, A. & Stern, R. (1985): Methods of Measurement of Non-Tariff Barriers, Geneva: UNCTAD
dc.relationDe Groot, H.L.F., Linders, G-J., Rielveld, P. & Subramanian, U. (2004): “The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns”, Kyklos, 57(1): 103-123
dc.relationDisdier, A-C. & Head, K. (2008): “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade”, The Review of Economics and Statistic, 90(1): 37-48
dc.relationDriffield, N. & Taylor, K. (2000): “FDI and the Labor Market: A review of the evidence and policy implications”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3): 90-103
dc.relationDrogendijka, R. & Slangen, A. (2006): “Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises”, International Business Review, 15(4): 361-380
dc.relationEriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A. & Sharma, D. (1997): “Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337-360
dc.relationFitzpatrick, G. & Modlin, M. (1986): Direct-line Distances: International Edition, Metuchen: Scarecrow Press
dc.relationFurman, J., Porter, M. & Stern, S. (2002): “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, 31(6): 899-933
dc.relationGaur, A., Delios, A. & Singh, K. (2007): “Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance”, Journal of Management, 33(4): 611-636
dc.relationGhemawat, P. & Altman, S. (2014): DHL Global Connectedness Index 2014, Deutsche Post DHL, Headquaters
dc.relationGhemawat, P. (2001): “Distance Still Matters. The Hard Reality of Global Expansion”, Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137-147
dc.relationGloberman, S. & Shapiro, D. (2002): “Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure”, World Development, 30(11): 1899-1919
dc.relationHall, R. & Jones, Ch. (1999): “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116
dc.relationHasan, I. & Tucci, C. (2010): “The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence”, Research Policy, 39(10), 1264-1276
dc.relationHymer, S. (1960): The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge: MIT Press
dc.relationInglehart, R. & Baker, W. (2000): “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional”, American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19-51
dc.relationIzenman, A. & Sommer, C. (1988): “Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404): 941-953
dc.relationJohanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (1977): “The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32
dc.relationHofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, Thousand Oaks: Sage
dc.relationKaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999): “Aggregating governance indicators”, Policy Research Working Paper, 2195: 39 pp.
dc.relationKnack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995): “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures”, Economics & Politics, 7(3): 207-227
dc.relationKogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988): “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432
dc.relationKostova, T. & Roth, K. (2002): “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects”, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233
dc.relationKostova, T., Roth K. & Dacin, T. (2008): “Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions”, Academy Management Review, 33(4): 994-1006
dc.relationKostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999): “Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81
dc.relationKoukhartchouk, O. & Maurel, M. (2003): “Accession to the WTO and EU enlargement: what potential for trade increase?”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 3944, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research
dc.relationKrzanowski, W. J. (1988): Principles of Multivariate Analysis: A User’s Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press
dc.relationLa Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998): “Law and finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113-1155
dc.relationMahalanobis, P. (1930): “On tests and measures of group divergence”, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 26, 541-588
dc.relationMahalanobis, P. (1936): “On the generalized distance in statistics”, Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2, 49-55
dc.relationMardia, K., Kent, J. & Bibby, J. (1979): Multivariate Analysis, London: Academic Press
dc.relationMarkus, H. & Zajonc, R. (1985): “The cognitive perspective in social psychology”, en Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.): The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: Random House, pp. 137-229
dc.relationMartin, X., Salomon, R. & Wu, Z. (2010): “The institutional determinants of agglomeration: a study in the global semiconductor industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6): 1769-1800
dc.relationMiller, S. & Parkhe, A. (2002): “Is there a Liability of Foreignness in Global Banking? An empirical test of Banks’ X-Efficiency”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(1): 55-75
dc.relationMitchell, A. & Krzanowski, W. (1985): “The Mahalanobis distance and elliptic distributions”, Biometrika, 72(2): 464-467
dc.relationMora, J.J. & Nuñez, J. (2009): “Economic convergence of income distribution worldwide from 1986 to 2000”, Journal of Economic Studies, 36(6): 675-691
dc.relationMorosini, P., Shane, S. & Singh, H. (1998): “National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158
dc.relationNorth, D. (1990): “Institutions”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112
dc.relationNorth, D. (1995): “Five Propositions about Institutional Change”, en Knight, J. & Sened, I. (eds.): Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 15-26
dc.relationOECD (2008): Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user guide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
dc.relationOlson, M. (1996): “Big Bill a Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich and Others Poor”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2): 3-24
dc.relationOxley, J. & Yeung, B. (2001): “E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 705-723
dc.relationPla-Barber, J. & León-Darder, F. (2004): Dirección de Empresas Internacionales. Madrid: Prentice Hall
dc.relationPerkins, S. (2014): “When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the case of multinational corporation”, Adminnistrative Science Quaterly, 59(1): 145-181
dc.relationRockefeller College (2007): “PAD 705 Handout: Factor Analysis”, disponible en: http://www.albany.edu/faculty/kretheme/PAD705/SupportMat/FactorAnalysisTheory.pdf
dc.relationSalgado-Ugarte, I., Shimizu, M. & Taniuchi, T. (1997): “Nonparametric assessment of multimodality for univariate data”, Stata Technical Bulletin, 38: 27-35
dc.relationSeber, G. (1984): Multivariate observations. New York: Wiley
dc.relationScott, W. (1995): Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage
dc.relationSethi, D. & Guisinger, S. (2002): “Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage: How multinational enterprises cope with the international business environment”, Journal of International Management, 8: 223-240
dc.relationSilverman, B. (1986): Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman & Hall
dc.relationShaxby, J.H. (1945): “Great circles routes”, Geography, 30(4): 112-115
dc.relationShenkar, O. (2001): “Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-535
dc.relationSokal, R. (1979): “Testing Statistical Significance of Geographic Variation Patterns”, Systematic Zoology, 28(2): 227-232
dc.relationWei, S-J. (2000): “Natural openness and good government”, NBER Working Paper no. 7765: 32 pp.
dc.relationWheeler, D. & Mody, A. (1992): “International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms”, Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2): 57-76
dc.relationWhitley, R. (1992): Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets, and societies, London: Sage
dc.relationXu, D., Pan, Y. & Beamish, P. (2004): “The Effect of Regulative and Normative Distances on MNE Ownership and Expatriate Strategies”, Management International Review, 44(3): 285-307
dc.relationZelner B., Henisz W. & Holburn, G. (2009): “Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989-2001”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3): 379-41
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.titleHacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución