Combinations of methods for collaborative evaluation of the usability of interactive software systems

dc.creatorSolano Alegria, Andres Fernando
dc.creatorCollazos, Cesar
dc.creatorRusu, Cristian Alexandru
dc.creatorFardoun, Habib M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T22:20:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T18:34:13Z
dc.date.available2019-09-10T22:20:53Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T18:34:13Z
dc.date.created2019-09-10T22:20:53Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier1687-5907 (en línea)
dc.identifier1687-5893 (impresa)
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10614/11090
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4089520
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3454242
dc.description.abstractUsability is a fundamental quality characteristic for the success of an interactive system. It is a concept that includes a set of metrics and methods in order to obtain easy-to-learn and easy-to-use systems. Usability Evaluation Methods, UEM, are quite diverse; their application depends on variables such as costs, time availability, and human resources. A large number of UEM can be employed to assess interactive software systems, but questions arise when deciding which method and/or combination of methods gives more (relevant) information. We propose Collaborative Usability Evaluation Methods, CUEM, following the principles defined by the Collaboration Engineering. This paper analyzes a set of CUEM conducted on different interactive software systems. It proposes combinations of CUEM that provide more complete and comprehensive information about the usability of interactive software systems than those evaluation methods conducted independently
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporation
dc.relationSolano, A., Collazos, C. A., Rusu, C., & Fardoun, H. M. (2016). Combinations of methods for collaborative evaluation of the usability of interactive software systems. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4089520
dc.relationAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction
dc.relationC. A. Ellis, S. J. Gibbs, and G. L. Rein, “Groupware some issues and experiences,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 38–58, 1991
dc.relationT. Granollers, MPIu+a una metodología que integra la ingeniería del software, la interacción persona-ordenador y la accesibilidad en el contexto de equipos de desarrollo multidisciplinares [M.S. thesis], Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad de Lleida, Lleida, Spain, 2007
dc.relationA. Folstad, E. L.-C. Law, and K. Hornbæk, “Analysis in practical usability evaluation: a survey study,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), pp. 2127–2136, May 2012
dc.relationG. Kolfschoten and G.-J. D. Vreede, “The collaboration engineering approach for designing collaboration processes,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Groupware: Design, Implementation and Use, Bariloche, Argentina, September 2007
dc.relationP. K. Chilana, J. O. Wobbrock, and A. J. Ko, “Understanding usability practices in complex domains,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), pp. 2337–2346, ACM, Atlanta, Ga, USA, April 2010
dc.relationA. Woolrych, K. Hornbæk, E. Frøkjær, and G. Cockton, “Ingredients and meals rather than recipes: a proposal for research that does not treat usability evaluation methods as indivisible wholes,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 940–970, 2011
dc.relationH. R. Hartson, T. S. Andre, and R. C. Williges, “Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 145–181, 2003
dc.relationA. Solano, Metodología para la evaluación colaborativa de la usabilidad de sistemas software interactivos [Ph.D. thesis], Departamento de Sistemas, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia, 2015
dc.relationG. L. Kolfschoten, R. O. Briggs, and G. Vreede, “Definitions in collaboration engineering,” in Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauia, Hawaii, USA, 2006
dc.relationJ. R. Lewis, “Usability: lessons learned... and yet to be learned,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 663–684, 2014
dc.relationT. Hollingsed and D. G. Novick, “Usability inspection methods after 15 years of research and practice,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '07), pp. 249–255, October 2007
dc.relationX. Ferré, Marco de integración de la usabilidad en el proceso de desarrollo software [Ph.D. thesis], Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos e Ingeniería del Software, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2005
dc.relationR. Otaiza, C. Rusu, and S. Roncagliolo, “Evaluating the usability of transactional web sites,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI '10), pp. 32–37, Saint Maarten, The Netherlands, February 2010
dc.relationW. D. Gray and M. C. Salzman, “Damaged merchandise? a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 203–261, 1998
dc.relationW. O. Galitz, The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques, Wiley Computer Pub, 2002
dc.relationJ. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993
dc.relationJ. Nielsen, “Usability inspection methods,” in Proceedings of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414, 1994
dc.relationJ. Rieman, M. Franzke, and D. Redmiles, “Usability evaluation with the cognitive walkthrough,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 387–388, Denver, Colo, USA, May 1995
dc.relationC. O'Malley, S. Draper, and M. Riley, “Constructive interaction: a method for studying user-computer-user interaction,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1–5, 1984
dc.relationA. Solano, T. Granollers, C. A. Collazos, and J. L. Arciniegas, “Experiencias en la especificación colaborativa de métodos de evaluación de usabilidad,” in Proceedings of the 14th Congreso Internacional de Interacción Persona-Ordenador (Interacción '13), Madrid, Spain, September 2013
dc.relationA. Solano, T. Granollers, C. A. Collazos, and C. Rusu, “Proposing formal notation for modeling collaborative processes extending HAMSTERS notation,” in Proceedings of the World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST '14), pp. 257–266, Madeira, Portugal, 2014
dc.relationM. Mehta, I. Ajmera, and R. Jondhale, Mobile Cloud Computing, International journal of Electronics, 2013
dc.relationA. Solano, C. Rusu, C. A. Collazos, and J. Arciniegas, “Evaluating interactive digital television applications through usability heuristics,” Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2013
dc.relationD. Quiñones, C. Rusu, and S. Roncagliolo, “Redefining usability heuristics for transactional web applications,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG '14), pp. 260–265, IEEE, April 2014
dc.relationR. Inostroza, C. Rusu, S. Roncagliolo, C. Jiménez, and V. Rusu, “Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG '12), pp. 662–667, April 2012
dc.relationT. Tullis and B. Albert, Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2013
dc.relationM. Piattini, F. García, J. Garzás, and M. Genero, “Medición y estimación del software: técnicas y métodos para mejorar la calidad y productividad del software,” RA-MA Editorial, pp. 121–127, 2008
dc.relationM. Hertzum, R. Molich, and N. E. Jacobsen, “What you get is what you see: revisiting the evaluator effect in usability tests,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 144–162, 2014
dc.relationL. Masip, T. Granollers, and M. Oliva, “A heuristic evaluation experiment to validate the new set of usability heuristics,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG '11), pp. 429–434, April 2011
dc.relationM. González, L. Masip, A. Granollers, and M. Oliva, “Quantitative analysis in a heuristic evaluation experiment,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1271–1278, 2009
dc.relationL. Masip, M. Oliva, and T. Granollers, “Classification of interactive system components enables planning heuristic evaluation easier,” in Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice, pp. 478–486, Springr, Berlin, Germany, 2011
dc.relationC. Rusu, S. Roncagliolo, V. Rusu, and C. Collazos, “A methodology to establish usability heuristics,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI '11), Gosier, France, 2011
dc.relationC. Rusu, R. Muñoz, S. Roncagliolo, S. Rudloff, V. Rusu, and A. Figueroa, “Usability heuristics for virtual worlds,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Future Internet (AFIN '11), pp. 16–19, Nice, France, August 2011
dc.relationC. Rusu, S. Roncagliolo, G. Tapia, D. Hayvar, V. Rusu, and D. Gorgan, “Usability heuristics for grid computing applications,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI '11), pp. 53–58, February 2011
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.titleCombinations of methods for collaborative evaluation of the usability of interactive software systems
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución