Influencia del nivel de avance educativo y el género en la toma de decisiones financieras: una aproximación desde la Prospect Theory

dc.creatorLadrón de Guevara-Cortés, Rogelio
dc.creatorGómez-Mejía, Alina
dc.creatorPeña-Vargas, Victor Alberto
dc.creatorMadrid-Paredones, Rosa Marina
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T14:44:24Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T14:44:24Z
dc.date.created2021-03-02T14:44:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.identifierLadrón-de Guevara Cortés, R., Gómez-Mejía, A., Peña-Vargas, V. A., & Madrid-Paredones, R. M. (2020). Influencia del nivel de avance educativo y el género en la toma de decisiones financieras: una aproximación desde la Prospect Theory. Revista de Finanzas y Política Económica, 12(1), 19-54.
dc.identifier2248-6046
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/25614
dc.description.abstractLas finanzas comportamentales retan los supuestos de racionalidad en la toma de decisiones financieras, pues asumen que la forma en la cual se presenta la información determina la decisión. El objetivo de esta investigación es estudiar la influencia de aspectos como el nivel de avance educativo y el género en la toma de decisiones financieras. Para esto, se replica el experimento seminal de Kahneman y Tversky (1979) en 600 estudiantes de una universidad colombiana. La información recolectada se analiza incluyendo: a) el contraste de independencia χ2, b) el test no-paramétrico Kruskal-Wallis y c) el test no-paramétrico Mann-Whitney. Los resultados muestran la aplicación de la Prospect Theory en la toma de decisiones financieras y revela una independencia de las decisiones en función de las variables de agrupación utilizadas. También se encontró que las mujeres tienen una mayor aversión al riesgo y que el nivel de avance en la educaciónno influye en las decisiones financieras.
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Behavioral finance challenges assumptions of rationality in financial decision-making, since it assumes that the way in which information is presented determines decisions. The objective of this research is to study the influence of aspects such as the level of education and gender on financial decision- making. To do this, the seminal experiment of Kahneman and Tversky (1979) is replicated with 600 students from a Colombian university. The data collected is analyzed using: 1) the independence test 2; 2) the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test; and 3) the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. The results evidence the application of prospect theory in financial decision-making, showing an independence of decisions based on the grouping variables used. It was also found that women have a greater risk aversion and that the level of education does not influence financial decisions.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
dc.publisherBogotá
dc.relation54
dc.relation1
dc.relation19
dc.relation12
dc.relationRevista Finanzas y Política Económica
dc.relationAguiar, F. (2004). Teoría de la decisión e incertidumbre: modelos normativos y descriptivos. Empiria: Revista de Metodologia de Ciencias Sociales, 8, 139-160. doi:10.5944/ empiria.8.2004.982
dc.relationAl-Nowaihi, A. y Dhami, S. (2010). Composite Prospect Theory: A proposal to combine ‘prospect theory’ and ‘cumulative prospect theory’. Leicester: University of Leicester.
dc.relationBellé , N., Cantarelli, P. y Belardinelli, P. (2018). Prospect Theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828-840. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12960
dc.relationBernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis. Petropolitanae, 5, 175-192.
dc.relationBirnbaum, M. (2017). Empirical evaluation of third-generation prospect theory. Theory and Decision, 84, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9607-y
dc.relationBogan, V., Just, D. y Dev, C. (2013). Team gender diversity and investment decisioin- making behavior. Review of Behavioral Finance, 5(2), 134-152. https://doi. org/10.1108/RBF-04-2012-0003
dc.relationBruhin, A., Fehr‐Duda, H. y Epper, T. (2010). Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion. Econometrica, 78(4), 1375-1412. https://doi. org/10.3982/ECTA7139
dc.relationCaci, H. (1999). KWALLIS2: Stata module to perform Kruskal-Wallis Test for equality of populations. Boston: Boston College, Department of Economics., Statistical Software Components S379201.
dc.relationCruciani, C. (2017). Investor decision-making and the role of the financial advisor: A behavioural finance approach. Venice: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relationDa Silva, R. F., Lagiola, U. C. y Rodrigues, R. N. (2009). Finanças comportamentais: um estudo comparativo utilizando a teoria dos prospectos com os alunos de graduacao docurso de ciencias contábeis. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negócios, 11(33), 383-403. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgn/v11n33/1983-0807-rbgn-11-33-383.pdf
dc.relationDaniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. y Teoh, S. (2002). Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(1), 139-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00091-5
dc.relationDurand, R., Newby, R., Tant, K. y Trepongkaruna, S. (2013). Overconfidence, overreaction and personality. Review of Behavioral Finance, 5(12), 104-133. https://doi. org/10.1108/RBF-07-2012-0011
dc.relationGenelhu , H. y da Silveira, L. (s.f.). Academic performance and Prospect Theory: An empirical study of decision behavior. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 71(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000100005
dc.relationGonzález, R. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 129-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0710
dc.relationHäckel , B., Pfosser, S. y Tränkler, T. (2017). Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory. Energy Policy, 111, 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.026
dc.relationHarsanyi, J. (1967). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model. Management Science, 14(3), 159-182.
dc.relationHarzer, J. H., Maffezzolli, E. C., Souza, A. y Vieira da Silva, W. (2016). Influence of level of study and gender on risk aversionand loss according to Prospect Tehory. Systems & Management, 11(4), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.20985/1980-5160.2016.v11n4.625
dc.relationHirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral Finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092214-043752
dc.relationKahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475. https://doi. org/10.1257/000282803322655392
dc.relationKahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
dc.relationKahneman, D., Slovic, P. y Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainly: Heuristics and biases. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationKraska-Miller, M. (2014). Nonparametric statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.relationLadrón de Guevara Cortés, R., Madrid Paredones, R. M. y Ladrón de Guevara Domínguez, R. (2019). Estudio empírico sobre la aplicación del Behavioral Finance en estudiantes del área técnica de la Universidad Veracruzana. Estocástica: Finanzas y Riesgo, 9(1), 63-96.
dc.relationLaerd Statistics. (2015). Kruskal Wallis H test using Stata. Statistical tutorials and software guides. https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/mwut/mann-whitney-test-in-spss.php
dc.relationLaerd Statistics. (2018). Kruskal Wallis H test using Stata. Statistical tutorials and software guides. https://statistics.laerd.com/stata-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-stata.php
dc.relationLevin, R. y Rubi, D. (2004). Estadística para administración y economía. Ciudad de México: Pearson Educación.
dc.relationLude, M. y Prügl, R. (2018). Risky decisions and the family firm bias: An experimental study based on Prospect Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796078
dc.relationMarinho, R., Teixeira, U., Veloso, C. y Rodrigues, R. (2009). Behavioral Finance: A comparative study using the prospect theory at the undergraduate course in accountancy. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 11(33), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.7819/ rbgn.v11i33.432
dc.relationMelo, C. y Silva, C. A. (2010). Finanças comportamentais: um estudo da influência da faixa etária, gênero e ocupação na aversão à perda. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizaoes, 4(8), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v4i8.34756
dc.relationNash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
dc.relationNigam, R. M., Srivastava, S. y Banwet, D. K. (2018). Behavioral mediators of financial decision making - A state-of-art literature review. Review of Behavioral Finance, 18(1), 2-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2016-0047
dc.relationPearl, J. (2016). The Sure-Thing Principle. Journal of Causal Inference, 4(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2016-0005
dc.relationRieger, M., Wang , M. y Hens , T. (2017). Estimating cumulative prospect theory parameters from an international survey. Theory and Decision, 82, 567-596. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9582-8
dc.relationRitter, J. (2003). Behavioral Finance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(4), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(03)00048-9
dc.relationSavage, L. (1954). The foundations of statistics. Nueva York: Dover Publications.
dc.relationSelten, R. (1975). Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4(1), 25-55. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01766400
dc.relationSimon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27(4), 779-799. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
dc.relationTversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
dc.relationViale, R. (2005). Le nuove economie. Dall’economia evolutiva a quella cognitiva: oltre i fallimenti della teoria neoclassica. Milán: Il Sole 24 Ore.
dc.relationVon Neumann, J. y Morgenstern, O. (2004/1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
dc.relationZhou, X., Wang, L., Liao, H., Wang, S., Lev, B. y Fujita, H. (2018). A prospect theory- based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 168(15), 28-38. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.029
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightsCopyright, Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2020
dc.titleInfluencia del nivel de avance educativo y el género en la toma de decisiones financieras: una aproximación desde la Prospect Theory
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución