dc.creatorBurman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan University
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-24T16:06:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T18:30:40Z
dc.date.available2018-02-24T16:06:10Z
dc.date.available2020-04-15T18:30:40Z
dc.date.created2018-02-24T16:06:10Z
dc.date.created2020-04-15T18:30:40Z
dc.identifier2011-2777
dc.identifier1657-9267
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/33389
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates the scope and functions of interdisciplinary connections for psychologists in dealing with its conceptual and methodological and sometimes political difficulties. Developing examples from my own context and practice, I indicate how feminist research has engaged with and addressed such questions. Brief consideration of three key epistemological turns in psychology, indicates that psychologists should neither uncritically turn to, nor turn away from, other disciplines but rather understand how what it is within such turns that indicates more about the nature of the conceptual, methodological and political problems we are trying to address.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.relationhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464/2229
dc.relationUniversitas Psychologica; Vol. 11, Núm. 2 (2012); 645-662
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectPsicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feminista
dc.subjectCritical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theory
dc.titleDisciplines for and against Psychology


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución