dc.creatorSvampa, Maristella Noemí
dc.date2012
dc.date2019-10-30T18:14:47Z
dc.identifierhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/84445
dc.identifierissn:0258-2384
dc.descriptionLatin America presents a very polarised scenario. Currently, one of the most remarkable patterns is the passage from the Washington Consensus, based on financial valorization, to the Commodity Consensus, based on the large-scale extraction and exportation of natural goods. The article attempts to characterise the current situation and, at the same time, aims at a presentation of different political and intellectual tendencies: liberal neo-developmentalism, progressive neo-developmentalism and post-developmental thinking. The text analyses some links between these perspectives, especially between liberal neo-developmentalism and progressive neo-developmentalism, because both imply a return to the classical understanding of development in the strong sense, that is, associated with a productivist vision and incaccurate industrialist rhetoric. Finally and against his background, it presents some general lines of contemporary post-developmental thinking.
dc.descriptionFacultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format43-73
dc.languageen
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.subjectSociología
dc.subjectliberal neo-developmentalism
dc.subjectprogressive neo-developmentalism
dc.subjectpost-developmental thinking
dc.titleResource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development
dc.typeArticulo
dc.typeArticulo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución