dc.creatorVine, Peter N. Dr.
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-14T11:49:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T18:06:22Z
dc.date.available2009-04-14T11:49:28Z
dc.date.available2019-08-05T18:06:22Z
dc.date.created2009-04-14T11:49:28Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-14T11:49:28Z
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/2139/4226
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3013662
dc.description.abstractAir dispersion modelling (ADM) was required by the Environmental Management Authority (EMA) of Trinidad and Tobago for an aluminium smelter complex, an iron and steel plant, and a chlor-alkali plant. This article critiques the outputs of the modelling. For the aluminium smelter complex, wind roses which were produced by the MM5 model, and then used in the CALPUFF ADM, underestimated calm periods 20-fold compared with actual observations. For the iron and steel plant and for the chlor-alkali plant, the ADMs (ISC3 and AERMOD) produced apparently unjustifiable bicycle-spoke patterns for airborne emission concentrations instead of concentric loops of iso-concentration around the source. It is concluded that the predictions of airborne emission concentrations were erroneous and that the Certificates of Environmental Clearance (CECs) for the plants must be withdrawn.
dc.languageen
dc.subjectAlutrint
dc.subjectEssar
dc.subjectCarisal
dc.subjectMM5
dc.subjectCALPUFF
dc.subjectISC3
dc.subjectAERMOD
dc.subjectTrinidad and Tobago
dc.subjectAir dispersion modelling
dc.titleA critique of industrial air dispersion modelling in Trinidad and Tobago
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución