dc.contributorFundação Oswaldo Cruz da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorDamian, B.b.
dc.creatorBonetti, Tatiana Carvalho de Souza
dc.creatorHorovitz, Dafne Dain Gandelman
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:47:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T17:22:02Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:47:29Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T17:22:02Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifierBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 25-33, 2015.
dc.identifier0100-879X
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8777
dc.identifierS0100-879X2015000100025.pdf
dc.identifierS0100-879X2015000100025
dc.identifier10.1590/1414-431X20144083
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2828029
dc.description.abstractPreimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was originally developed to diagnose embryo-related genetic abnormalities for couples who present a high risk of a specific inherited disorder. Because this technology involves embryo selection, the medical, bioethical, and legal implications of the technique have been debated, particularly when it is used to select features that are not related to serious diseases. Although several initiatives have attempted to achieve regulatory harmonization, the diversity of healthcare services available and the presence of cultural differences have hampered attempts to achieve this goal. Thus, in different countries, the provision of PGD and regulatory frameworks reflect the perceptions of scientific groups, legislators, and society regarding this technology. In Brazil, several texts have been analyzed by the National Congress to regulate the use of assisted reproduction technologies. Legislative debates, however, are not conclusive, and limited information has been published on how PGD is specifically regulated. The country requires the development of new regulatory standards to ensure adequate access to this technology and to guarantee its safe practice. This study examined official documents published on PGD regulation in Brazil and demonstrated how little direct oversight of PGD currently exists. It provides relevant information to encourage reflection on a particular regulation model in a Brazilian context, and should serve as part of the basis to enable further reform of the clinical practice of PGD in the country.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.relationBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectPreimplantation genetic diagnosis
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectRegulation
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.titlePractices and ethical concerns regarding preimplantation diagnosis. Who regulates preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Brazil?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución