dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorFeldner Junior, Paulo Cezar
dc.creatorDelroy, Carlos Antonio
dc.creatorMartins, Sérgio Brasileiro
dc.creatorCastro, Rodrigo de Aquino
dc.creatorSartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
dc.creatorGirão, Manoel João Batista Castello
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:44:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T17:08:19Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:44:51Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T17:08:19Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:44:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-01
dc.identifierClinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 8, p. 871-875, 2012.
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7218
dc.identifierS1807-59322012000800003.pdf
dc.identifierS1807-59322012000800003
dc.identifier10.6061/clinics/2012(08)03
dc.identifierWOS:000308409100003
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2826470
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare female sexual function after surgical treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with either small intestine submucosa grafting or traditional colporrhaphy. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned, preoperatively, to the small intestine submucosa graft (n = 29) or traditional colporrhaphy (n = 27) treatment group. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed at 12 months. The Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire was used to assess sexual function. Data were compared with independent samples or a paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: In the small intestine submucosa group, the total mean Female Sexual Function Index score increased from 15.5±7.2 to 24.4±7.5 (p<0.001). In the traditional colporrhaphy group, the total mean Female Sexual Function Index score increased from 15.3±6.8 to 24.2±7.0 (p<0.001). Improvements were noted in the domains of desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. There were no differences between the two groups at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Small intestine submucosa repair and traditional colporrhaphy both improved sexual function postoperatively. However, no differences were observed between the two techniques.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectSexual Function
dc.subjectPelvic Organ Prolapse
dc.subjectSIS Graft
dc.titleSexual function after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución