dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.creatorYamauchi, Liria Yuri [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorTravaglia, Teresa Cristina Francischetto
dc.creatorBernardes, Sidnei Ricardo Nobre
dc.creatorFigueiroa, Maise C.
dc.creatorTanaka, Clarice
dc.creatorFu, Carolina
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:44:50Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:44:50Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01
dc.identifierClinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 7, p. 767-772, 2012.
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7206
dc.identifierS1807-59322012000700011.pdf
dc.identifierS1807-59322012000700011
dc.identifier10.6061/clinics/2012(07)11
dc.identifierWOS:000307723100011
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To describe noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation use in intensive care unit clinical practice, factors associated with NPPV failure and the associated prognosis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Medical disorders (59%) and elective surgery (21%) were the main causes for admission to the intensive care unit. The main indications for the initiation of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation were the following: post-extubation, acute respiratory failure and use as an adjunctive technique to chest physiotherapy. The noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation failure group was older and had a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score. The noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation failure rate was 35%. The main reasons for intubation were acute respiratory failure (55%) and a decreased level of consciousness (20%). The noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation failure group presented a shorter period of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation use than the successful group [three (2-5) versus four (3-7) days]; they had lower levels of pH, HCO3 and base excess, and the FiO2 level was higher. These patients also presented lower PaO2:FiO2 ratios; on the last day of support, the inspiratory positive airway pressure and expiratory positive airway pressure were higher. The failure group also had a longer average duration of stay in the intensive care unit [17 (10-26) days vs. 8 (5-14) days], as well as a higher mortality rate (9 vs. 51%). There was an association between failure and mortality, which had an odds ratio (95% CI) of 10.6 (5.93 -19.07). The multiple logistic regression analysis using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure as a dependent variable found that treatment tended to fail in patients with a Simplified Acute Physiology Score II$34, an inspiratory positive airway pressure level > 15 cmH2O and pH<7.40. CONCLUSION: The indications for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation were quite varied. The failure group had a longer intensive care unit stay and higher mortality. Simplified Acute Physiology Score II > 34, pH<7.40 and higher inspiratory positive airway pressure levels were associated with failure.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectArtificial ventilation
dc.subjectNoninvasive Ventilation
dc.subjectIntensive Care Unit
dc.subjectCohort Study
dc.titleNoninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in clinical practice at a large university-affiliated Brazilian hospital
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución