dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Saio Paulo Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Goias Unidade Jatobá
dc.creatorFleury, Anna Maria
dc.creatorSilva, Antonio Carlos da
dc.creatorPochini, Alberto de Castro
dc.creatorEjnisman, Benno
dc.creatorLira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de
dc.creatorAndrade, Marilia dos Santos
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:42:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T16:58:57Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:42:46Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T16:58:57Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:42:46Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifierClinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 66, n. 2, p. 313-320, 2011.
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6168
dc.identifierS1807-59322011000200022.pdf
dc.identifierS1807-59322011000200022
dc.identifier10.1590/S1807-59322011000200022
dc.identifierWOS:000289365200022
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2825420
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture. METHODS: We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured. RESULTS: Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%). CONCLUSIONS: This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectIsokinetic exercise
dc.subjectexercise
dc.subjectmuscle imbalance
dc.subjectmuscle rupture
dc.subjectorthopedics rehabilitation
dc.titleIsokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución