dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorFerreira, Ana F. B.
dc.creatorLaurindo, Ieda M. M.
dc.creatorRodrigues, Priscilla T.
dc.creatorFerraz, Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorKowalski, Sérgio C. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorTanaka, Clarice
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:38:15Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:38:15Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:38:15Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifierClinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 63, n. 5, p. 595-600, 2008.
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4125
dc.identifierS1807-59322008000500005.pdf
dc.identifierS1807-59322008000500005
dc.identifier10.1590/S1807-59322008000500005
dc.identifierWOS:000260168400004
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and to assess its measurement properties. INTRODUCTION: This instrument is an outcome measure with 10 domains with scores ranging from 0-100, worst to best, respectively. The translated instrument will improve the examinations and foot care of rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: The questions were translated, back-translated, evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee and pre-tested (n = 40 rheumatoid arthritis subjects). The new version was submitted to a field test (n = 65) to evaluate measurement properties such as test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity. The Health Assessment Questionnaire, Numeric Rating Scale for foot pain and Sharp/van der Heijde scores for foot X-rays were used to test the construct validity. RESULTS: The cross-cultural adaptation was completed with minor wording adaptations from the original instrument. The evaluation of measurement properties showed high reliability with low variation coefficients between interviews. The a-Cronbach coefficients varied from 0.468 to 0.855, while correlation to the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Numeric Rating Scale was statistically significant for five out of eight domains. DISCUSSION: Intra- and inter-observer correlations showed high reliability. Internal consistency coefficients were high for all domains, revealing higher values for less subjective domains. As for construct validity, each domain revealed correlations with a specific group of parameters according to what the domains intended to measure. CONCLUSION: The FHSQ was cross-culturally adapted, generating a reliable, consistent, and valid instrument that is useful for evaluating foot health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectFoot
dc.subjectHealth Status
dc.subjectRheumatoid Arthritis
dc.subjectTranslation
dc.titleBrazilian version of the foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ-BR): cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of measurement properties
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución