dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) | |
dc.creator | Ferreira, Ana F. B. | |
dc.creator | Laurindo, Ieda M. M. | |
dc.creator | Rodrigues, Priscilla T. | |
dc.creator | Ferraz, Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP] | |
dc.creator | Kowalski, Sérgio C. [UNIFESP] | |
dc.creator | Tanaka, Clarice | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-14T13:38:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-14T13:38:15Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-06-14T13:38:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 63, n. 5, p. 595-600, 2008. | |
dc.identifier | 1807-5932 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4125 | |
dc.identifier | S1807-59322008000500005.pdf | |
dc.identifier | S1807-59322008000500005 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1590/S1807-59322008000500005 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000260168400004 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and to assess its measurement properties. INTRODUCTION: This instrument is an outcome measure with 10 domains with scores ranging from 0-100, worst to best, respectively. The translated instrument will improve the examinations and foot care of rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: The questions were translated, back-translated, evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee and pre-tested (n = 40 rheumatoid arthritis subjects). The new version was submitted to a field test (n = 65) to evaluate measurement properties such as test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity. The Health Assessment Questionnaire, Numeric Rating Scale for foot pain and Sharp/van der Heijde scores for foot X-rays were used to test the construct validity. RESULTS: The cross-cultural adaptation was completed with minor wording adaptations from the original instrument. The evaluation of measurement properties showed high reliability with low variation coefficients between interviews. The a-Cronbach coefficients varied from 0.468 to 0.855, while correlation to the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Numeric Rating Scale was statistically significant for five out of eight domains. DISCUSSION: Intra- and inter-observer correlations showed high reliability. Internal consistency coefficients were high for all domains, revealing higher values for less subjective domains. As for construct validity, each domain revealed correlations with a specific group of parameters according to what the domains intended to measure. CONCLUSION: The FHSQ was cross-culturally adapted, generating a reliable, consistent, and valid instrument that is useful for evaluating foot health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Faculdade de Medicina / USP | |
dc.relation | Clinics | |
dc.rights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.subject | Foot | |
dc.subject | Health Status | |
dc.subject | Rheumatoid Arthritis | |
dc.subject | Translation | |
dc.title | Brazilian version of the foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ-BR): cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of measurement properties | |
dc.type | Artigo | |