dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorInstitute of Goiânia
dc.contributorUniversity of São Paulo
dc.creatorLucas, César De Paula
dc.creatorPrandini, Mirto N.
dc.creatorCaldas, José Guilherme Mendes Pereira
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-14T13:31:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T16:25:31Z
dc.date.available2015-06-14T13:31:43Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T16:25:31Z
dc.date.created2015-06-14T13:31:43Z
dc.date.issued2005-09-01
dc.identifierArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO, v. 63, n. 3a, p. 605-613, 2005.
dc.identifier0004-282X
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/2668
dc.identifierS0004-282X2005000400010.pdf
dc.identifierS0004-282X2005000400010
dc.identifier10.1590/S0004-282X2005000400010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2821920
dc.description.abstractThe material for this research consisted of 93 patients with dural arteriovenous malformations (DAVMs) who were studied retrospectively with regards to therapeutic success and failure, who had undergone either neurosurgery, or embolization or a combination of both methods and whose disease was located in the cavernous sinus, the superior sagittal sinus, the transverse-sigmoid sinus of the anterior fossa and the tentorium. Thus, it was possible to arrive at the following conclusions: treatment of the DAVMs must be indicated, jointly, by an interventionist neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon; DAVMs of the transverse-sigmoid sinus were better treated when a combination of both methods was used; DAVMs of the tentorium were also better treated with a combined method; the endovascular method ensured only a 50% chance of therapeutic success for DAVMs of the superior sagittal sinus; DAVMs of the cavernous sinus are better treated when the endovascular method was used with a transvenous approach, relative to the transarterial approach.
dc.description.abstractO material utilizado consistiu de 93 pacientes portadores de malformações arteriovenosas durais (MAVDs) estudados retrospectivamente em relação ao sucesso e ao fracasso terapêutico submetidos aos métodos neurocirúrgico ou endovascular ou, ainda, combinação entre ambos, em que a doença se localizou nas regiões do seio cavernoso, do seio sagital superior, do seio transverso-sigmóide, da fossa anterior e do tentório. As conclusões foram as seguintes: o tratamento das MAVDs deve ser indicado pelo neurorradiologista intervencionista e pelo neurocirurgião, conjuntamente; as MAVDs do seio transverso-sigmóide foram melhor tratadas através do método combinado; as MAVDs do tentório foram melhor tratadas através do método combinado; as MAVDs do seio sagital superior tratadas por método endovascular asseguraram apenas 50% de sucesso terapêutico; as MAVDs do seio cavernoso são melhor tratadas por método endovascular empregando-se a via transvenosa quando comparadas com a via transarterial.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAcademia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.relationArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectdural arteriovenous malformation
dc.subjectendovascular therapy
dc.subjectneurosurgical therapy
dc.subjectmalformação arteriovenosa dural
dc.subjectmétodo endovascular
dc.subjectmétodo neurocirúrgico
dc.titleAnalysis of the best therapeutic alternative for intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución