dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorBraido, Luís Henrique Bertolino
dc.creatorFerreira, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:35:34Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:35:34Z
dc.date.created2018-05-10T13:35:34Z
dc.date.issued2006-04
dc.identifier1065-9129 / 1938-274X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/23060
dc.identifier10.1007/s00199-004-0581-6
dc.identifier000228879300002
dc.description.abstractIt is widely believed that call options induce risk-taking behavior. However, Ross (2004) challenges this intuition by demonstrating the impossibility of inducing managers with arbitrary preferences to always act as if they were less risk averse. If preferences and price distributions are unknown, risk-taking behavior cannot be always induced by an option contract. Here, we prove a new result showing that, with no information about preferences and some knowledge about prices, one can write a call option that makes all managers prefer riskier projects to safer ones. This points out that in order to design options that induce risk taking it is sufficient to have information about price distributions.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationEconomic theory
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectStochastic dominance
dc.subjectStock options
dc.subjectRisk-taking
dc.subjectCompensation
dc.titleOptions can induce risk taking for arbitrary preferences
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución