Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures

dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorMansur, Juliana Arcoverde
dc.creatorSobral, Filipe
dc.creatorGoldszmidt, Rafael Guilherme Burstein
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:37:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T14:06:40Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:37:45Z
dc.date.available2019-05-22T14:06:40Z
dc.date.created2018-05-10T13:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier1090-9516
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/23806
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.003
dc.identifier000412267100009
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2690243
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has shown that Paternalistic Leadership (PL), an emerging non-western theory, is endorsed in high power distance and collectivistic societies. However, the ambiguous nature of PL calls for a better understanding of its endorsement across cultures. Based on GLOBE's project data from 59 societies, we examine PL acceptance around the world. Our findings suggest that PL is not universally nor homogeneously endorsed, but that different patterns of endorsement give rise to idiosyncratic shades of PL across cultures. Specifically, among the 22 societies that endorse some form of paternalism, our results allowed us to distinguish between Benevolent and Exploitative PL
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relationJournal of world business
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectPaternalistic leadership
dc.subjectCross-cultural studies
dc.subjectProject GLOBE
dc.subjectApproximate invariance
dc.subjectExploitative paternalism
dc.subjectBenevolent paternalism
dc.titleShades of paternalistic leadership across cultures
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución