dc.contributor | Demais unidades::CEPESP | |
dc.creator | Barberia, Lorena Guadalupe | |
dc.creator | Avelino Filho, George | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-17T19:39:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-17T19:39:36Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-01-17T19:39:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19935 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we show that education, health and social security expenditures did not increase during elections. Based on a panel of fifteen Latin American democracies from 1973 to 2000, we show that there are important increases in social spending in the inaugural year of a new presidential administration. We argue that social policy is used by Latin American democracies as an instrument to reward voters after winners enter office and not as a tool to manipulate outcomes before elections as commonly argued in the literature. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | Political budget cycles | |
dc.subject | Elections | |
dc.subject | Social spending | |
dc.subject | Latin America | |
dc.title | Opportunistic political cycles and social spending: an examination of transition and consolidated democracies in Latin America | |
dc.type | Paper | |