dc.contributorEscolas::EPGE
dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorCysne, Rubens Penha
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-13T15:43:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T13:58:12Z
dc.date.available2008-05-13T15:43:41Z
dc.date.available2019-05-22T13:58:12Z
dc.date.created2008-05-13T15:43:41Z
dc.date.issued2004-04-01
dc.identifier0104-8910
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/963
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2688623
dc.description.abstractThis work adds to Lucas (2000) by providing analytical solutions to two problems that are solved only numerically by the author. The first part uses a theorem in control theory (Arrow' s sufficiency theorem) to provide sufficiency conditions to characterize the optimum in a shopping-time problem where the value function need not be concave. In the original paper the optimality of the first-order condition is characterized only by means of a numerical analysis. The second part of the paper provides a closed-form solution to the general-equilibrium expression of the welfare costs of inflation when the money demand is double logarithmic. This closed-form solution allows for the precise calculation of the difference between the general-equilibrium and Bailey's partial-equilibrium estimates of the welfare losses due to inflation. Again, in Lucas's original paper, the solution to the general-equilibrium-case underlying nonlinear differential equation is done only numerically, and the posterior assertion that the general-equilibrium welfare figures cannot be distinguished from those derived using Bailey's formula rely only on numerical simulations as well.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEscola de Pós-Graduação em Economia da FGV
dc.relationEnsaios Econômicos;543
dc.subjectArrow's theorem
dc.subjectOptimal control
dc.titleTwo additions to Lucas's 'inflation and welfare'
dc.typeDocumentos de trabajo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución