dc.contributor | Escolas::EPGE | |
dc.contributor | FGV | |
dc.creator | Cysne, Rubens Penha | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-13T15:43:41Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-22T13:58:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-05-13T15:43:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-22T13:58:12Z | |
dc.date.created | 2008-05-13T15:43:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-04-01 | |
dc.identifier | 0104-8910 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2688623 | |
dc.description.abstract | This work adds to Lucas (2000) by providing analytical solutions to two problems that are solved only numerically by the author. The first part uses a theorem in control theory (Arrow' s sufficiency theorem) to provide sufficiency conditions to characterize the optimum in a shopping-time problem where the value function need not be concave. In the original paper the optimality of the first-order condition is characterized only by means of a numerical analysis. The second part of the paper provides a closed-form solution to the general-equilibrium expression of the welfare costs of inflation when the money demand is double logarithmic. This closed-form solution allows for the precise calculation of the difference between the general-equilibrium and Bailey's partial-equilibrium estimates of the welfare losses due to inflation. Again, in Lucas's original paper, the solution to the general-equilibrium-case underlying nonlinear differential equation is done only numerically, and the posterior assertion that the general-equilibrium welfare figures cannot be distinguished from those derived using Bailey's formula rely only on numerical simulations as well. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Escola de Pós-Graduação em Economia da FGV | |
dc.relation | Ensaios Econômicos;543 | |
dc.subject | Arrow's theorem | |
dc.subject | Optimal control | |
dc.title | Two additions to Lucas's 'inflation and welfare' | |
dc.type | Documentos de trabajo | |