dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorStewart, Richard B.
dc.creatorBadin, Michelle Ratton Sanchez
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:36:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T13:31:20Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:36:08Z
dc.date.available2019-05-22T13:31:20Z
dc.date.created2018-05-10T13:36:08Z
dc.date.issued2011-10
dc.identifier0899-8256 / 1090-2473
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/23252
dc.identifier10.1093/icon/mor051
dc.identifier000300040500002
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2683440
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the WTO development of Global Administrative Law (GAL) norms of transparency, participation, reason giving and review. Vertically, the WTO has significantly improved members' domestic administration by requiring adherence to GAL norms. But internally, it has failed to follow such norms in decision making by its own administrative bodies; it should do so. Horizontally, it should evaluate other global regulatory bodies' adherence to GAL norms in deciding whether to recognize their regulatory standards. Wider adoption of GAL norms would promote more effective and responsive trade regulation in an increasingly complex global administrative space engaging a wide variety of decision making bodies, constituencies, and competing values.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press
dc.relationIcon-international journal of constitutional law
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectGood governance
dc.subjectWTO
dc.subjectTransparency
dc.subjectLegitimacy
dc.subjectSystem
dc.subjectRules
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectPower
dc.titleThe World Trade Organization: multiple dimensions of Global Administrative Law
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución