dc.contributor | Demais unidades::CEPESP | |
dc.creator | Praça, Sérgio | |
dc.creator | Freitas, Andréa Marcondes de | |
dc.creator | Hoepers, Bruno | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-31T17:13:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-31T17:13:00Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-01-31T17:13:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier | 1868-4890 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19978 | |
dc.description.abstract | Studies on coalition management in presidential systems usually focus on two types of goods used by the president and formateur party to hold together coalitions: exchange goods (such as individual budget amendments) and coalition goods (such as ministries). This research notes analyzes, with an original dataset of party members and political appointees in Brazil, a different type of good: presidential political appointments. Our study shows that partisan political appointees vary greatly among Brazilian ministries and within them. We also found that there is a disconnect between how many seats a political party holds in Congress and the number of political appointment offices it controls. This has implications for the literature on bureaucracy and politics and the literature on coalition management. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Journal of Politics in Latin America | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | Brazil | |
dc.subject | Bureaucracy | |
dc.subject | Coalition management | |
dc.subject | Presidentialism | |
dc.title | Political appointments and coalition management in Brazil, 2007-2010 | |
dc.type | Article (Journal/Review) | |