dc.contributor | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (UNLaM) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor | Laboratório de Escrita Científica | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Oxford Brookes University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-11T17:20:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-11T17:20:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-12-11T17:20:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09-01 | |
dc.identifier | Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, v. 213, p. 23-33. | |
dc.identifier | 1872-7484 | |
dc.identifier | 1566-0702 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176328 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.05.006 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85047000394 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85047000394.pdf | |
dc.identifier | 5860525135106995 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Down syndrome (DS) results in many changes, including dysfunction in cardiac autonomic modulation. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis evaluates the autonomic function and it is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. Objective: To present results of a systematic review and a meta-analysis about heart rate variability in individuals with DS. Method: A systematic review was performed on PubMed, PubMed Central and Web of science databases. We included articles that exhibited all the terms: “Down Syndrome” “heart rate variability” “autonomic nervous system” “autonomic dysfunction” and “cardiac autonomic modulation”. We conducted the meta-analysis to compare “DS” to “controls” during rest. Random effects models were used, as were appropriate tests for heterogeneity. Results: From 271 studies, 13 were included in our review. These are conducted with volunteers from a wide age range, of either gender, and not taking medications. Meta-analysis displayed that there were no significant differences between the groups at rest, except the RMSSD, which revealed a significant (Z = −2.80, p = 0.005) main effect (Hedge's g = −0.55, 95% CI [−0.93; −0.16]), indicating difference in individuals with DS compared with controls. Conclusion: There is autonomic dysfunction in individuals with DS, which may or may not be expressed at rest, but it is usually demonstrated in an autonomic task. Meta-analysis specified that there was no significant alteration between DS and the controls during rest, except RMSSD index which was lower in DS than controls. PROSPERO: CRD42017068647. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical | |
dc.relation | 0,902 | |
dc.rights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | “Autonomic nervous system” | |
dc.subject | “Cardiac autonomic modulation” | |
dc.subject | “Down syndrome” | |
dc.subject | “Meta-analysis” | |
dc.subject | “Systematic review” | |
dc.title | Heart rate variability in individuals with Down syndrome – A systematic review and meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Otros | |