dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-11T17:19:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-11T17:19:08Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-12-11T17:19:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04-01 | |
dc.identifier | Future Microbiology, v. 13, n. 5, p. 565-575, 2018. | |
dc.identifier | 1746-0921 | |
dc.identifier | 1746-0913 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176118 | |
dc.identifier | 10.2217/fmb-2017-0221 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85044769919 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To evaluate the adequacy of the disc-diffusion test and E-test® compared with detection of mecA for coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures, nasal swabs and wounds. Results: Agreement between all techniques was observed in 65.7% of cases. The greatest discrepancy between mecA/susceptible E-test was observed for non-epidermidis species. A resistance breakpoint ≤19 mm using the oxacillin disc was found to best classify all coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates; Staphylococcus epidermidis, ≤19 mm (oxacillin) and ≤27 mm (cefoxitin); Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus capitis, ≤21 mm (oxacillin) and ≤18 mm (cefoxitin); Staphylococcus warneri, MICs ≥0.75 mg/l. Conclusion: Although no longer recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, we observed some cases in which only the oxacillin disc-diffusion test detected resistance. The discrepancy between phenotypic tests and mecA is probably due to heterogeneity and borderline resistance. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Future Microbiology | |
dc.relation | 1,270 | |
dc.relation | 1,270 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | coagulase-negative staphylococci | |
dc.subject | oxacillin resistance | |
dc.subject | reference breakpoints | |
dc.title | Evaluation of reference values for phenotypic tests to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |