Clinical Comparison of the Subepithelial Connective Tissue versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Multiple Gingival Recession Coverage on Anterior Teeth Using the Tunneling Technique

dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)
dc.contributorUniversidad del Pacífico (UP)
dc.contributorUniversidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción-Guairá (UCG)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:13:01Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:13:01Z
dc.date.created2018-12-11T17:13:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifierCase Reports in Dentistry, v. 2017.
dc.identifier2090-6455
dc.identifier2090-6447
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174826
dc.identifier10.1155/2017/4949710
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85021664282
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85021664282.pdf
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare, clinically, the efficiency of the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) using the tunnel technique to cover the multiple gingival recessions on anterior teeth, in the same patient. Within the limits of this study, we conclude that both SCTG and L-PRF proved to be reliable options for the treatment of gingival recessions, efficiently supporting the biological and aesthetic demand, stimulating the periodontal tissues' health, and bringing reliable and highly predictable results.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationCase Reports in Dentistry
dc.relation0,229
dc.relation0,229
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleClinical Comparison of the Subepithelial Connective Tissue versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Multiple Gingival Recession Coverage on Anterior Teeth Using the Tunneling Technique
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución