Brasil | Artículos de revistas
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:52:30Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:52:30Z
dc.date.created2018-12-11T16:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.identifierRevista de Economia Politica, v. 38, n. 1, p. 150-166, 2018.
dc.identifier1809-4538
dc.identifier0101-3157
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/170805
dc.identifier10.1590/0101-31572018v38n01a09
dc.identifierS0101-31572018000100150
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85044242003
dc.identifierS0101-31572018000100150.pdf
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to present the main heterodox (not determinist) contributions to the time approach in economics. Also it is looking for to compare the dominant (determinist) view with the not determinist one. In addition, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the reasons why the deterministic approach of time is still dominant - and perhaps hegemonic - among the economists. This circumstance has remained so despite the fact that the alternative view (not deterministic) has proved to be most appropriate to its object and it has been gaining importance and significant attention in a wide range of scientific disciplines. This article seeks to advance an explanatory hypothesis for this paradoxical and intriguing situation, without claim to offer, however, a complete or definitive answer to this important and intricate issue.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista de Economia Politica
dc.relation0,282
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDiachronism
dc.subjectEx ante and Ex post
dc.subjectIrreversibility
dc.subjectTime
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.titleNotas para a discussão do tempo na economia: Uma modelagem heterodoxa
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución