dc.contributorJoint Research Centre
dc.contributorEnvironmental Policy Centre
dc.contributorCEH
dc.contributor(ICTA-ICP)
dc.contributorEdifici PRBB
dc.contributorNorwegian Institute for Nature research (NINA)
dc.contributorNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
dc.contributorUniversidade Nova de Lisboa
dc.contributorHungarian Academy of Sciences
dc.contributorMuséum national d'Histoire naturelle
dc.contributorHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra
dc.contributorSlovak Academy of Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:50:35Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:50:35Z
dc.date.created2018-12-11T16:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.identifierEcosystem Services, v. 29, p. 465-480.
dc.identifier2212-0416
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/170388
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85034417841
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85034417841.pdf
dc.description.abstractEcosystem service (ES) spatial modelling is a key component of the integrated assessments designed to support policies and management practices aiming at environmental sustainability. ESTIMAP (“Ecosystem Service Mapping Tool”) is a collection of spatially explicit models, originally developed to support policies at a European scale. We based our analysis on 10 case studies, and 3 ES models. Each case study applied at least one model at a local scale. We analyzed the applications with respect to: the adaptation process; the “precision differential” which we define as the variation generated in the model between the degree of spatial variation within the spatial distribution of ES and what the model captures; the stakeholders’ opinions on the usefulness of models. We propose a protocol for adapting ESTIMAP to the local conditions. We present the precision differential as a means of assessing how the type of model and level of model adaptation generate variation among model outputs. We then present the opinion of stakeholders; that in general considered the approach useful for stimulating discussion and supporting communication. Major constraints identified were the lack of spatial data with sufficient level of detail, and the level of expertise needed to set up and compute the models.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationEcosystem Services
dc.relation1,743
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEcosystem services maps
dc.subjectMap comparison
dc.subjectSpatial modelling
dc.subjectStakeholders’ survey
dc.titlePractical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución