dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-11T16:50:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-11T16:50:06Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-12-11T16:50:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-01 | |
dc.identifier | Quality and Reliability Engineering International, v. 33, n. 8, p. 2739-2745, 2017. | |
dc.identifier | 1099-1638 | |
dc.identifier | 0748-8017 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170285 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1002/qre.2232 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85031738118 | |
dc.description.abstract | The R chart and the S2 chart are the usual charts for monitoring process dispersion; however, the double sampling (DS) scheme has only be used with the S2 chart. The difficulty in obtaining the properties of the DS R chart might explain the lack of papers dealing with this type of DS chart. The S2 chart has the advantage of being more efficient than the R chart, but the same is not always observed with their DS versions. Depending on the size of the 2 samples, the DS R chart performs better. The trade-off between operational simplicity and power of detection might lead the practitioner to choose the DS R chart, even with the DS S2 chart signaling faster. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Quality and Reliability Engineering International | |
dc.relation | 0,955 | |
dc.relation | 0,955 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | average run length | |
dc.subject | average sample size | |
dc.subject | double sampling | |
dc.subject | range chart | |
dc.subject | Shewhart chart | |
dc.title | The double sampling range chart | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |