dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:46:15Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:46:15Z
dc.date.created2018-12-11T16:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifierJournal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 19, n. 6, p. 104-110, 2016.
dc.identifier1097-9751
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169524
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85014742963
dc.description.abstractThis study determined if there are changes in 1RM load of 8 exercises performed as isolated tests or in three different orders of execution. The subjects consisted of 10 male volunteers (age, 23.1 ± 3.3 yrs; height, 180.0 ± 6.9 cm; body weight, 81.6 ± 13.1 kg; BMI, 25.1 ± 3.2 kg·m-2; body fat, 14.7 ± 5.2%) who had at least three months of resistance training experience. The tests were made on the following exercises: (a) bench press; (b) leg press; (c) triceps extension; (d) knee extension; (e) lat pull-down; (f) half squat; (g) biceps curls; and (h) leg curl. A one-way ANOVA (Sphericity Assumed) for repeated measures with 1RM loads in the four tests was used to determine the level of significance, and the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined for the four 1RM loads. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results showed no significant differences between in 1RM loads in any of the exercises or sequences (P < 0.05). The findings indicate that there are no differences between these methods, and that a sequence with 8 exercises can be performed to determine 1RM loads.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
dc.relation0,168
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject1RM test
dc.subjectExercise order
dc.subjectResistance exercises
dc.titleAre there differences between 1RM loads determined in isolated tests vs. In three different sequences?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución