dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T03:50:32Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T03:50:32Z
dc.date.created2018-11-29T03:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-01
dc.identifierRevista Direito Gv. Sao Paulo Sp: Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola Direito, v. 13, n. 2, p. 445-473, 2017.
dc.identifier1808-2432
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/165907
dc.identifier10.1590/2317-6172201717
dc.identifierS1808-24322017000200428
dc.identifierWOS:000416712000004
dc.identifierS1808-24322017000200428.pdf
dc.description.abstractThe competition for world market shares involves not only companies, but also States. In fact, public policies are adopted in order to aid domestic enterprises to increase their share in the world market. For this reason, it is often questioned whether some State acts can be considered unfair acts, since they prevent a competition on a level playing field. The WTO law responds this question affirmatively, because it allows its members to react against dumping and subsidies. This authorization aims to protect domestic companies from unfair competition. However, this authorization does not mean that antidumping and countervailing measures are always good trade policies and free from economic costs. Therefore, the use of these trade policies instruments should be submitted to additional debate.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherFundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola Direito
dc.relationRevista Direito Gv
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectWorld trade
dc.subjectunfair trade practices
dc.subjectWTO law
dc.subjectdumping
dc.subjectsubsidies
dc.titleON UNFAIR STATE ACTS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE WTO LAW: THE AMBIVALENCE OF ITS DISCIPLINE AND ITS JUSTIFICATIONS
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución