Artículos de revistas
Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps
Fecha
2017-04-01Registro en:
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 466, n. 2, p. 1444-1461, 2017.
0035-8711
10.1093/mnras/stw2106
WOS:000398284600013
WOS000398284600013.pdf
Autor
UCL
Rhodes Univ
Swiss Fed Inst Technol
Univ Portsmouth
Inst Ciencies IEspai ICE
Univ Penn
Cerro Tololo Interamer Observ
Fermilab Natl Accelerator Lab
Princeton Univ
CNRS
Sorbonne Univ
Carnegie Observ
Stanford Univ
SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab
Lab Interinst Astron LIneA
Observ Nacl
Univ Illinois
Natl Ctr Supercomp Applicat
Univ Southampton
Excellence Cluster Univ
Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen
CALTECH
Univ Michigan
Univ Chicago
Ohio State Univ
Australian Astron Observ
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Inst Catalana Recerca Estudis Avancats
Dept Phys & Astron
Ctr Invest Energet
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Institución
Resumen
It is well known that the probability distribution function (PDF) of galaxy density contrast is approximately lognormal; whether the PDF of mass fluctuations derived from weak lensing convergence (kappa(WL)) is lognormal is less well established. We derive PDFs of the galaxy and projected matter density distributions via the counts-in-cells (CiC) method. We use maps of galaxies and weak lensing convergence produced from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data over 139 deg(2). We test whether the underlying density contrast is well described by a lognormal distribution for the galaxies, the convergence and their joint PDF. We confirm that the galaxy density contrast distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Poisson noise at angular scales from 10 to 40 arcmin (corresponding to physical scales of 3-10 Mpc). We note that as kappa(WL) is a weighted sum of the mass fluctuations along the line of sight, its PDF is expected to be only approximately lognormal. We find that the kappa(WL) distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Gaussian shape noise at scales between 10 and 20 arcmin, with a best-fitting chi(2)/dof of 1.11 compared to 1.84 for a Gaussian model, corresponding to p-values 0.35 and 0.07, respectively, at a scale of 10 arcmin. Above 20 arcmin a simple Gaussian model is sufficient. The joint PDF is also reasonably fitted by a bivariate lognormal. As a consistency check, we compare the variances derived from the lognormal modelling with those directly measured via CiC. Our methods are validated against maps from the MICE Grand Challenge N-body simulation.