dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T16:17:10Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T16:17:10Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T16:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifierPesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada. Joao Pessoa: Assoc Apoio Pesquisa & Saude Bucal-apesb, v. 15, n. 1, p. 75-84, 2015.
dc.identifier1519-0501
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/160896
dc.identifier10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.9
dc.identifierWOS:000362600500009
dc.identifier7376974788169619
dc.description.abstractObjective: To verify the structural microdeformation by strain gages, around implants that have metal infrastructure, obtained by different materials and techniques impressions. Material and Methods: Three internal hexagon implants in polyurethane block (master model) with abutments were taken the impression with differents materials and techniques impression (n=4): addition silicon and transfer for open tray technique (Group I), condensation silicon and transfer for closed tray technique (Group II); and polyether and transfer for open tray techniques (Group III). Impressions were poured with type IV stone. Metallic infrastructure were made and installed in the master model by an aid of a manual ratchet wrench. A torque of 20N was used to install the metallic infrastructure. Microdeformation analysis was performed around the implants by strain gauge method. Two gauges were inserted into the polyurethane base, and three measurements were taken for each infrastructure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inference. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify association between materials and impression techniques and deformation around the implants, at 5% confidence. Results: Microdeformations around the implants showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.123) between the experimental groups, Group I (215.8 mu epsilon), Group II (194.9 mu epsilon) and Group III (297.4 mu epsilon). Conclusion: The use of different materials and techniques impression to made of infrastructures for fixed implant-supported dental prosthesis did not present difference in microdeformation values around implants.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAssoc Apoio Pesquisa & Saude Bucal-apesb
dc.relationPesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectDental Implantation
dc.subjectDental Impression Materials
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis
dc.titleMicrodeformation of Infrastructure for Implant-Supported fixed Dental Prosthesis by Strain-Gauge Method: Influence of Technique and Material Impression
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución