dc.contributorUniv Cidade Sao Paulo UNICID
dc.contributorUniv Fed Ceara
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T16:04:22Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T16:04:22Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T16:04:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.identifierRevista Tempos E Espacos Educacao. Sergipe: Univ Federal Sergipe, v. 11, n. 25, p. 201-212, 2018.
dc.identifier1983-6597
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/160406
dc.identifier10.20952/revtee.v11i25.6895
dc.identifierWOS:000437523400015
dc.description.abstractThis essay highlights that the external evaluations affect the autonomy of the schools and teachers in relation to the organization of the pedagogical work, even though the LDB assures the pedagogical autonomy regarding the organization of its practices based on its local needs and reality. In this sense, it is sought in this work to rely on studies and research that evidence the evaluation as against the regulation of the public school; Evaluation versus standardization / homogenization of contents and school curricula as a quality parameter; knowledge-regulation instead of knowledge-emancipation, as well as schools that associate rewards or punishment versus the results of external evaluations. Finally, it reiterates the need for managers, pedagogical coordinators and teachers to realize that it is necessary to strengthen their professional autonomy, the continued teacher training, the pedagogical organization of the school and, consequently, that this is reflected in the students' learning and, above all, in the (re) construction of the school.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniv Federal Sergipe
dc.relationRevista Tempos E Espacos Educacao
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCritics and dialogue
dc.subjectSchool
dc.subjectExternal Evaluation
dc.subjectPedagogical Aytonomy
dc.titleSCritics and dialogues in the light of therelation school versus external evaluations
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución