dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T16:03:10Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T16:03:10Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T16:03:10Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifierCadernos De Dereito Actual. Santiago De Compostela: Univ Santiago Compostela, n. 8, p. 399-412, 2017.
dc.identifier2340-860X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/160386
dc.identifierWOS:000436552400025
dc.description.abstractMoral damage is a king of indemnity that protects imaterial rights against injuries committed, those rights are inserted within personalities scope, previously deprived of judicial protection, once these rights were used just to protect material goods. On the other hand, currently these subjetives rights are destinated to preserve the most important aspects that makes men unique, the human dignity. With the start of fundamental rights protection in civil order, the injured was required to prove its three indispensable requirements, negligence, malice and causality connection, This obligation, sometimes ended up exposing men to a new humiliating and degrading situation. Then, a new modality was necessary to abadon damages prove, wich is called moral damage in re ipsa and that day by day gains a more relevant space in the legal conjuncture.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniv Santiago Compostela
dc.relationCadernos De Dereito Actual
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectmoral damage
dc.subjectpresumed moral damage
dc.subjectcivil responsability
dc.subjectnegligence
dc.subjectmalice
dc.subjectcausality connection
dc.titleThe evolution of civil responsability in contemporary constitutional law: from the moral damage in nature to moral damage in re ipsa
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución