dc.contributorUniv Groningen
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:44:48Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:44:48Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T15:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifierJournal Of The Philosophy Of History. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, v. 11, n. 2, p. 247-273, 2017.
dc.identifier1872-261X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/159656
dc.identifier10.1163/18722636-12341369
dc.identifierWOS:000406879800009
dc.description.abstractIn this interview, Jonathan Menezes asks Frank Ankersmit about various aspects of his theory of historical experience, focusing especially on his main book on the subject, Sublime Historical Experience (2005), but also on other writings in which he accounted for historical experience, like History and Tropology (1994) and Meaning, Truth and Reference in Historical Representation (2012). The subjects addressed in the conversation include some of the existent criticism and polemic about this 'experiential' part of Ankersmit's work; a new analysis of the relationship between Huizinga's 'historical sensation' and Ankersmit's 'historical experience'; Ankersmit's criticism of and attempt to go beyond Rorty and the so-called 'linguistic transcendentalism'; and Ankersmit's point of view on the connection between historical experience and the German historicist tradition.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishers
dc.relationJournal Of The Philosophy Of History
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecthistorical experience
dc.subjecthistorical sensation
dc.subjectHuizinga
dc.subjecttranscendentalism
dc.subjectRorty
dc.subjectRomanticism
dc.subjectmoods and feelings
dc.subjecthistoricism
dc.titleHistorical Experience Interrogated: A Conversation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución