Adherence to the value of justice in children: a comparison between spontaneous answers and answers given to a structured questionnaire

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorFundacao Carlos Chagas
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:28:08Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:28:08Z
dc.date.created2018-11-26T15:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifierEducacao. Santa Maria: Univ Federal Santa Maria, v. 40, n. 1, p. 229-240, 2015.
dc.identifier0101-9031
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/158567
dc.identifier10.5902/198464449000
dc.identifierWOS:000363319900018
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess adherence to the value justice in children. We compared the responses of children between 9 and 12 years, in two types of questionnaires: the first with alternatives, built in increasing levels of social perspective descentration, and the second with the same issues presented openly. The questions were presented in the form of stories involving distributive, commutative and retributive justice. The questionnaire with alternatives was applied in 111 children and the structured questionnaire in other 28. In both types of questionnaires children showed the same trends in adherence to the value, however, the spontaneous responses were more punitive and using stronger expiatory sanctions than in the closed one, in the case of stories about retributive and procedural justice.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniv Federal Santa Maria
dc.relationEducacao
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectJustice
dc.subjectMoral Value
dc.subjectRating Scale
dc.titleAdherence to the value of justice in children: a comparison between spontaneous answers and answers given to a structured questionnaire
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución