Comparison of high performance liquid chromatography and three titrimetric methods for the determination of ceftazidime in pharmaceutical formulations

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-28T16:56:36Z
dc.date.available2016-01-28T16:56:36Z
dc.date.created2016-01-28T16:56:36Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierAdvances in Analytical Chemistry, v. 2, n. 3, p. 6-13, 2012.
dc.identifier2163-2847
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/133788
dc.identifier10.5923/j.aac.20120203.01
dc.identifier9048202968088646
dc.identifier9881720291571774
dc.description.abstractThree different assays for the quality control of ceftazidime in commercial formulations were developed and compared: acidimetric, iodometric and nonaqueous methods. Method validation yielding good results and included precision and accuracy, with good recovery percent ranged from 99.67 to 100.39, and R.S.D. values smaller than 2%. Results were compared to those obtained by high performance liquid chromatographic method, developed and published previously by us, and no evidence of significant difference was observed. The results obtained agreed well with the contents stated on the labels, being rapid, simple and inexpensive alternative method for the determination of ceftazidime in pharmaceutical formulations.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherScientific & Academic Publishing
dc.relationAdvances in Analytical Chemistry
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectCeftazidime
dc.subjectHPLC
dc.subjectMethod comparison
dc.subjectPharmaceutical analysis
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectTitrimetry
dc.titleComparison of high performance liquid chromatography and three titrimetric methods for the determination of ceftazidime in pharmaceutical formulations
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución