dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-24T13:57:45Z
dc.date.available2015-02-24T13:57:45Z
dc.date.created2015-02-24T13:57:45Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierHistória da Ciência e Ensino: construindo interfaces, v. 8, p. 68-89, 2013.
dc.identifier2178-2911
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/115092
dc.identifierISSN21782911-2013-08-68-89.pdf
dc.identifier4270559937092886
dc.description.abstractThe focus of this work is to present an example of refutation of the concept of element inside the seventeenth-century scientific revolution, mainly through Robert Boyle’s The Sceptical Chymist. On the first section of this paper the notion of element as considered by the ancient Greeks in Aristotle’s Physics and modern chemists in Paracelsus will be briefly presented. After that in the second section Boyle’s deconstruction of the idea of element will be exposed considering his argumentation of why this notion is prejudicial to the study of nature. Finally, in the third section follows the constructive stage in which a new hypothesis is presented (the corpuscular hypothesis) as the best option to replace the notion of element.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationHistória da Ciência e Ensino: construindo interfaces
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectHistória da Ciência
dc.subjectHistória da Química
dc.subjectRobert Boyle
dc.titleUm exemplo de negação do conceito de elemento na filosofia natural
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución