dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:09:14Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:09:14Z
dc.date.created2014-12-03T13:09:14Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01
dc.identifierBulletin Of Engineering Geology And The Environment. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 72, n. 3-4, p. 589-600, 2013.
dc.identifier1435-9529
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112116
dc.identifier10.1007/s10064-013-0529-9
dc.identifierWOS:000327495600026
dc.identifier8987677644041247
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated alternatives for producing erosion susceptibility maps, considering different weight combinations for an environment's attributes, according to four different points of views. The attributes considered were landform, steepness, soils, rocks and land occupation. Considered alternatives were: (1) equal weights, more traditional approach, (2) different weights, according to a previous study in the area, (3) different weights, based on other works in the literature, and (4) different weights based on the analytical hierarchical process. The area studied included the Prosa Basin located in Campo Grande-Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. The results showed that the assessed alternatives can be used together or in different stages of studies aiming at urban planning and decision-making on the interventions to be applied.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationBulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
dc.relation1.825
dc.relation0,896
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSusceptibility chart
dc.subjectErosion
dc.subjectHierarchical analytical process
dc.titleEstablishing erosion susceptibility: analytical hierarchical process and traditional approaches
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución