dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:32Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:32Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:29:32Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-23
dc.identifierActa Informatica Medica, v. 21, n. 2, p. 93-97, 2013.
dc.identifier0353-8109
dc.identifier1986-5988
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75428
dc.identifier10.5455/aim.2013.21.93-97
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84877882299
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84877882299.pdf
dc.identifier8039557526741132
dc.identifier6421032169146894
dc.identifier9719883814872582
dc.identifier0000-0002-3800-3050
dc.description.abstractBreast implants are medical devices that are used to augment breast size or to reconstruct the breast following mastectomy or to correct a congenital abnormality. Breast implants consist of a silicone outer shell and a filler (most commonly silicone gel or saline). Approximately 5 to 10 million women worldwide have breast implants. Histomorphometric study to evaluate the biological tissue compatibility of silicone implants suitable for plastic surgery and the adverse effects and risks of this material. Thirty Wistar white rats received subcutaneous implants and the revestiment of silicone gel Silimed ®®, and randomized into six groups of five animals each, according to the type of implanted material and the time of sacrifice. Eight areas of 60.11mm2 corresponding to the obtained surgical pieces were analyzed, counting mesenchymal cells, eosinophils, and foreign body giant cells, observing an acceptable biocompatibility in all implants, for subsequent statistical analysis by Tukey test. Silicone gel showed inflammation slightly greater than for other groups, with tissue reactions varying from light to moderate, whose result was the formation of a fibrous capsule around the material, recognized by the organism as a foreign body. Despite frequent local complications and adverse outcomes, this research showed that the silicone and top layer presented an acceptable chronic inflammatory reaction, which did not significantly differ from the control group. In general, it is possible to affirm that silicone gel had acceptable levels of biocompatibility, confirmed the rare presence of foreign body giant cells, and when of the rupture, formed a fibrous capsule around the material, separating the material of the organism. © AVICENA 2013.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationActa Informatica Medica
dc.relation0,275
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBreast Implantation
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectRats
dc.subjectSilicone Gels
dc.subjectWistar
dc.subjectsilicone gel
dc.subjectadverse outcome
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectanimal tissue
dc.subjectbiocompatibility
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjecteosinophil
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectfibroblast
dc.subjectgiant cell
dc.subjecthistocompatibility
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.subjectinflammatory cell
dc.subjectinflammatory infiltrate
dc.subjectmorphometrics
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectplastic surgery
dc.subjectqualitative analysis
dc.subjectrat
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectsilicone prosthesis
dc.subjecttissue reaction
dc.titleEvaluation of the biocompatibility of silicone gel implants - histomorphometric study
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución