dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversity of Toledo
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:20Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:20Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2013-02-01
dc.identifierProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, v. 227, n. 2, p. 220-234, 2013.
dc.identifier0954-4054
dc.identifier2041-2975
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74527
dc.identifier10.1177/0954405412467589
dc.identifierWOS:000317990600003
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84875896213
dc.description.abstractIn this study, different methods of cutting fluid application are used in turning of a difficult-to-machine steel (SAE EV-8). Initially, a semisynthetic cutting fluid was applied using a conventional method (i.e. overhead flood cooling), minimum quantity of cutting fluid, and pulverization. A lubricant of vegetable oil (minimum quantity of lubricant) was also applied using the minimum quantity method. Thereafter, a cutting fluid jet under high pressure (3.0 MPa) was singly applied in the following regions: chip-tool interface, top surface of the chip (between workpiece and chip) and tool-workpiece contact. Moreover, two other methods were used: an interflow between conventional application and chip-tool interface jet (combined method) and, finally, three jets simultaneously applied. In order to carry out these tests, it was necessary to set up a high-pressure system using a piston pump for generating a cutting fluid jet, a venturi for fluid application (minimum quantity of cutting fluid and minimum quantity of lubricant) and a nozzle for cutting fluid pulverization. The output variables analyzed included tool life, surface roughness, cutting tool temperature, cutting force, chip form, chip compression rate and machined specimen microstructure. Among the results, it can be observed that the tool life increases and the cutting force decreases with the application of cutting fluid jet, mainly when it is directed to the chip-tool interface. Excluding the methods involving jet fluid, the conventional method seems to be more efficient than other methods of low pressure, such as minimum quantity of volume and pulverization, when considering just the cutting tool wear. © 2013 IMechE.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
dc.relation1.445
dc.relation0,621
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCutting fluid jet
dc.subjectcutting force
dc.subjectminimum quantity of fluid
dc.subjectpulverization
dc.subjecttool life
dc.subjectChip-tool interfaces
dc.subjectConventional methods
dc.subjectCutting fluid application
dc.subjectCutting forces
dc.subjectTool life
dc.subjectTool temperatures
dc.subjectTool-workpiece contact
dc.subjectComminution
dc.subjectCutting
dc.subjectCutting tools
dc.subjectGrinding (machining)
dc.subjectMachine tools
dc.subjectSurface roughness
dc.subjectVegetable oils
dc.subjectCutting fluids
dc.titleEffect of different methods of cutting fluid application on turning of a difficult-to-machine steel (SAE EV-8)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución