dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorInstitute of Science Technology - CETEC
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:26:06Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:26:06Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:26:06Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-01
dc.identifierJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 19, n. 6, p. 610-615, 2011.
dc.identifier1678-7757
dc.identifier1678-7765
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72774
dc.identifier10.1590/S1678-77572011000600011
dc.identifierS1678-77572011000600011
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84855818872
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84855818872.pdf
dc.identifier0056660842284397
dc.identifier0000-0002-1458-601X
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The present study used strain gauge analysis to perform an in vitro evaluation of the effect of axial loading on 3 elements of implant-supported partial fixed prostheses, varying the type of prosthetic cylinder and the loading points. Material and methods: Three internal hexagon implants were linearly embedded in a polyurethane block. Microunit abutments were connected to the implants applying a torque of 20 Ncm, and prefabricated Co-Cr cylinders and plastic prosthetic cylinders were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard patterns cast in Co-Cr alloy (n = 5). Four strain gauges (SG) were bonded onto the surface of the block tangentially to the implants, SG 01 mesially to implant 1, SG 02 and SG 03 mesially and distally to implant 2, respectively, and SG 04 distally to implant 3. Each metallic structure was screwed onto the abutments with a 10 Ncm torque and an axial load of 30 kg was applied at five predetermined points (A, B, C, D, E). The data obtained from the strain gauge analyses were analyzed statistically by RM ANOVA and Tukey's test, with a level of significance of p<0.05. Results: There was a significant difference for the loading point (p=0.0001), with point B generating the smallest microdeformation (239.49 με) and point D the highest (442.77 με). No significant difference was found for the cylinder type (p=0.748). Conclusions: It was concluded that the type of cylinder did not affect in the magnitude of microdeformation, but the axial loading location influenced this magnitude.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation1.709
dc.relation0,645
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectDental prosthesis
dc.subjectImplant-supported dental prosthesis
dc.subjectchromium derivative
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectdenture
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttooth implantation
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis
dc.subjecttorque
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectChromium Alloys
dc.subjectDental Abutments
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis Design
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTorque
dc.titleEffect of axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses by strain gauge analysis
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución