dc.contributorUmeå University
dc.contributorUniversidade de Cuiabá (UNIC)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorGothenburg University
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:25:59Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:25:59Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:25:59Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-01
dc.identifierClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, v. 13, n. 3, p. 224-230, 2011.
dc.identifier1523-0899
dc.identifier1708-8208
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72632
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00208.x
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79960951913
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous studies have pointed out that the mere elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane promotes bone formation without the use of augmentation materials. Purpose: This experimental study aimed at evaluating if the two-stage procedure for sinus floor augmentation could benefit from the use of a space-making device in order to increase the bone volume to enable later implant installation with good primary stability. Materials and Methods: Six male tufted capuchin primates (Cebus apella) were subjected to extraction of the three premolars and the first molar on both sides of the maxilla to create an edentulous area. The sinuses were opened using the lateral bone-wall window technique, and the membrane was elevated. One resorbable space-making device was inserted in each maxillary sinus, and the bone window was returned in place. The animals were euthanatized after 6 months, and biopsy blocks containing the whole maxillary sinus and surrounding soft tissues were prepared for ground sections. Results: The histological examination of the specimens showed bone formation in contact with both the schneiderian membrane and the device in most cases even when the device was displaced. The process of bone formation indicates that this technique is potentially useful for two-stage sinus floor augmentation. The lack of stabilization of the device within the sinus demands further improvement of space-makers for predictable bone augmentation. Conclusions: It is concluded that (1) the device used in this study did not trigger any important inflammatory reaction; (2) when the sinus membrane was elevated, bone formation was a constant finding; and (3) an ideal space-making device should be stable and elevate the membrane to ensure a maintained connection between the membrane and the secluded space. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.relation3.097
dc.relation1,827
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAugmentation
dc.subjectBone formation
dc.subjectEndosseous implants
dc.subjectMaxillary sinus
dc.subjectSinus membrane elevation
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectbiodegradable implant
dc.subjectbone development
dc.subjectCebus
dc.subjectimplant
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmaxillary sinus
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectnose mucosa
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectsinus floor augmentation
dc.subjectAbsorbable Implants
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectImplants, Experimental
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinus
dc.subjectNasal Mucosa
dc.subjectOsteogenesis
dc.subjectSinus Floor Augmentation
dc.titleHistological outcomes on the development of new space-making devices for maxillary sinus floor augmentation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución