dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:22:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:22:26Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-27T11:22:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-04-01 | |
dc.identifier | Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 149-154, 2007. | |
dc.identifier | 0882-7524 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69593 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1097/01.TGR.0000270183.90778.8e | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000246668400006 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-34248394689 | |
dc.identifier | 7964386240653380 | |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was to analyze randomized controlled trials published in the last decades involving motor intervention as a treatment for dementia, based on Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) criteria. A database search was performed using the following keywords: randomized controlled trial, dementia, physiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, physical education, motor approach, exercise, and physical activity. Ten trials were found: 4 related to physiotherapy, 3 to occupational therapy, 1 to physical education, and 2 to interdisciplinary motor intervention. The efficacy of motor intervention was confirmed in the following variables: psychosocial function, physical health and function, affective status, and caregiver's distress (P < .05). Results related to mobility were not significant (P > .05). Behavior, cognitive performance, activities of daily living, and risk of falls were not similar among the articles. From a total score of 10 points, with excellence characterized as the highest punctuation, the articles were classified between 3 and 7 by PEDro. Motor intervention was shown to be an alternative for minimizing physical and mental decline. PEDro has been confirmed as a very reliable tool to analyze studies and as an evaluation criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, allowing the establishment of motor intervention strategies for the treatment of patients with dementia. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation | |
dc.relation | 0.461 | |
dc.relation | 0,252 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Dementia | |
dc.subject | Motor intervention | |
dc.subject | Randomized controlled trials | |
dc.subject | affect | |
dc.subject | aged | |
dc.subject | behavior | |
dc.subject | caregiver | |
dc.subject | clinical trial | |
dc.subject | cognition | |
dc.subject | controlled clinical trial | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | daily life activity | |
dc.subject | data base | |
dc.subject | dementia | |
dc.subject | distress syndrome | |
dc.subject | elderly care | |
dc.subject | exercise | |
dc.subject | falling | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | health | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | major clinical study | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | occupational therapy | |
dc.subject | patient mobility | |
dc.subject | physical activity | |
dc.subject | physical education | |
dc.subject | physiotherapy | |
dc.subject | qualitative analysis | |
dc.subject | quantitative analysis | |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | |
dc.subject | reliability | |
dc.subject | risk assessment | |
dc.subject | social psychology | |
dc.title | Effects of motor intervention in elderly patients with dementia: An analysis of randomized controlled trials | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |