dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:21:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:21:42Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-27T11:21:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-12-01 | |
dc.identifier | Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 16, n. 6, p. 683-691, 2005. | |
dc.identifier | 0905-7161 | |
dc.identifier | 1600-0501 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68548 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01090.x | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000233290200008 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-33644697375 | |
dc.identifier | 8399870097572073 | |
dc.identifier | 9831236034935598 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The purpose of this study was to histologically analyze the influence of bioactive glass and/or a calcium sulfate barrier on bone healing in surgically created defects in rat tibias. Material and methods: Sixty-four rats were divided into 4 groups: C (control), CS (calcium sulfate), BG (bioactive glass), and BG/CS (bioactive glass/calcium sulfate). A surgical defect was created in the tibia of each animal. In Group CS, a calcium sulfate barrier was placed to cover the defect. In Group BG the defect was filled with bioactive glass. In Group BG/CS, it was filled with bioactive glass and protected by a barrier of calcium sulfate. Animals were sacrificed at 10 or 30 days post-operative. The formation of new bone in the cortical area of the defect was evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: At 10 days post-operative, Group C presented significantly more bone formation than Groups CS, BG, or BG/CS. No statistically significant differences were found between the experimental groups. At 30 days post-operative, Group C demonstrated significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups. Groups CS and BG/CS showed significantly more bone formation than Group BG. No statistically significant differences were found between Group CS and BG/CS. Conclusions: (a) the control groups had significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups; (b) at 10 days post-operative, no significant differences were found between any of the experimental groups; and (c) at 30 days post-operative, the groups with a calcium sulfate barrier had significantly more bone formation than the group that used bioactive glass only. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Clinical Oral Implants Research | |
dc.relation | 4.305 | |
dc.relation | 2,462 | |
dc.relation | 2,462 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Bioactive | |
dc.subject | Bone regeneration | |
dc.subject | Bone substitutes | |
dc.subject | Calcium sulfate | |
dc.subject | Glass | |
dc.subject | bioglass | |
dc.subject | calcium sulfate | |
dc.subject | animal | |
dc.subject | artificial membrane | |
dc.subject | bone prosthesis | |
dc.subject | bone regeneration | |
dc.subject | ceramics | |
dc.subject | comparative study | |
dc.subject | drug effect | |
dc.subject | image processing | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | methodology | |
dc.subject | periodontics | |
dc.subject | physiology | |
dc.subject | rat | |
dc.subject | tibia | |
dc.subject | Animals | |
dc.subject | Bone Regeneration | |
dc.subject | Bone Substitutes | |
dc.subject | Calcium Sulfate | |
dc.subject | Ceramics | |
dc.subject | Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal | |
dc.subject | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Membranes, Artificial | |
dc.subject | Rats | |
dc.subject | Tibia | |
dc.title | Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials: A histological and histometric study in rat tibias | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |