dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorNorth Carolina State University
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:36Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:36Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:21:36Z
dc.date.issued2005-09-01
dc.identifierPoultry Science, v. 84, n. 9, p. 1363-1369, 2005.
dc.identifier0032-5791
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68374
dc.identifier10.1093/ps/84.9.1363
dc.identifierWOS:000231328100005
dc.identifier2-s2.0-24744446815
dc.identifier6152329000274858
dc.description.abstractTwo experiments were conducted to develop and evaluate a model to estimate ME requirements and determine Gompertz growth parameters for broilers. The first experiment was conducted to determine maintenance energy requirements and the efficiencies of energy utilization for fat and protein deposition. Maintenance ME (ME m) requirements were estimated to be 157.8, 112.1, and 127.2 kcal of ME/kg 0.75 per day for broilers at 13, 23, and 32°C, respectively. Environmental temperature (T) had a quadratic effect on maintenance requirements (ME m = 307.87 - 15.63T + 0.3105T 2; r 2= 0.93). Energy requirements for fat and protein deposition were estimated to be 13.52 and 12.59 kcal of ME/g, respectively. Based on these coefficients, a model was developed to calculate daily ME requirements: ME = BW 0.75 (307.87 - 15.63T + 0.3105 T 2) + 13.52 G f + 12.59 G p. This model considers live BW, the effects of environmental temperature, and fractional fat (G f) and protein (G p) deposition. The second experiment was carried out to estimate the growth parameters of Ross broilers and to collect data to evaluate the ME requirement model proposed. Live BW, empty feather-free carcass, weight of the feathers, and carcass chemical compositions were analyzed until 16 wk of age. Parameters of Gompertz curves for each component were estimated. Males had higher growth potential and higher capacity to deposit nutrients than females, except for fat deposition. Data of BW and body composition collected in this experiment were fitted into the energy model proposed herein and the equations described by Emmans (1989) and Chwalibog (1991). The daily ME requirements estimated by the model determined in this study were closer to the ME intake observed in this trial compared with other models. ©2005 Poultry Science Association, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationPoultry Science
dc.relation2.216
dc.relation1,112
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFactorial method
dc.subjectGrowth parameter
dc.subjectMetabolizable energy requirement
dc.subjectModeling energy utilization
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectbiological model
dc.subjectcaloric intake
dc.subjectchicken
dc.subjectenergy metabolism
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgrowth, development and aging
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmetabolism
dc.subjectnutritional requirement
dc.subjectstatistical model
dc.subjectweight gain
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectChickens
dc.subjectEnergy Intake
dc.subjectEnergy Metabolism
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectLinear Models
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectModels, Biological
dc.subjectNutritional Requirements
dc.subjectWeight Gain
dc.subjectGallus gallus
dc.titleModeling energy utilization and growth parameter description for broiler chickens
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución