dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:31:46Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:31:46Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:31:46Z
dc.date.issued2008-09-01
dc.identifierFutures. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 40, n. 7, p. 597-612, 2008.
dc.identifier0016-3287
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/40817
dc.identifier10.1016/j.futures.2007.12.010
dc.identifierWOS:000257980800001
dc.description.abstractCommon sense tells us that the future is an essential element in any strategy. In addition, there is a good deal of literature on scenario planning, which is an important tool in considering the future in terms of strategy. However, in many organizations there is serious resistance to the development of scenarios, and they are not broadly implemented by companies. But even organizations that do not rely heavily on the development of scenarios do, in fact, construct visions to guide their strategies. But it might be asked, what happens when this vision is not consistent with the future? To address this problem, the present article proposes a method for checking the content and consistency of an organization's vision of the future, no matter how it was conceived. The proposed method is grounded on theoretical concepts from the field of future studies, which are described in this article. This study was motivated by the search for developing new ways of improving and using scenario techniques as a method for making strategic decisions. The method was then tested on a company in the field of information technology in order to check its operational feasibility. The test showed that the proposed method is, in fact, operationally feasible and was capable of analyzing the vision of the company being studied, indicating both its shortcomings and points of inconsistency. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationFutures
dc.relation2.256
dc.relation1,233
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleIs your vision consistent? A method for checking, based on scenario concepts
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución