dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:24:24Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:24:24Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-01
dc.identifierJournal of Oral Rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 31, n. 9, p. 884-889, 2004.
dc.identifier0305-182X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/35012
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01308.x
dc.identifierWOS:000223907700011
dc.identifier8547747556446020
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated retention force and fatigue resistance of two overdenture attachment systems. Twenty samples (O-ring and Bar-Clip) from two manufacturers (Conexao Sistemas de Protese and Lifecore Biomedical) were prepared and divided into four groups: (i) Conexao/O-ring; (ii) Conexao/Bar-Clip; (iii) Lifecore/O-ring and (iv) Lifecore/Bar-Clip, with five samples in each group. They were submitted to mechanical fatigue test using a servohydraulic machine performing 5500 cycles of insertion and removal (f=0.8 Hz), immersed in artificial saliva. Retention force values were obtained three times (0, 3000 and after 5500 cycles) simulating the clinical service, using a tensile strength at 1 mm min(-1) and load cell of 1 kN. Data were analysed with analysis of variance and Tukey's test at 5% level. Results showed that Conexao/Bar-Clip specimens had significantly higher retention values than Lifecore/Bar-Clip (44.61 and 18.44 N, respectively), Conexao/O-ring specimens had significantly lower values than Lifecore/O-ring (13.91 and 19.75 N, respectively). Conexao/Bar-Clip values were always significantly higher than those of Conexao/O-ring group (44.61 and 13.91 N, respectively). Lifecore (O-ring and Bar-Clip) presented similar values (19.75 and 18.44 N, respectively). The systems evaluated showed satisfactory retention force values, before and after fatigue testing. Conexao/Bar-Clip specimens presented the highest values. A 5-year simulation of insertion and removal did not decrease retention values or fracture components.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.relationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relation2.051
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectoverdentures
dc.subjectattachments
dc.subjectosseointegrated implants
dc.subjectmechanical properties
dc.subjectfatigue strength
dc.subjectretention
dc.titleRetention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución